From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Steigerwald Subject: Re: Honest timeline for btrfsck Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:09:40 +0200 Message-ID: <201109101209.40759.Martin@lichtvoll.de> References: <4E5FE9FC.9040705@cchtml.com> <20110901203442.GA17928@carfax.org.uk> (sfid-20110901_234748_655472_30ADB77C) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 To: Hugo Mills , Michael Cronenworth , "linux-btrfs" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110901203442.GA17928@carfax.org.uk> List-ID: Am Donnerstag, 1. September 2011 schrieb Hugo Mills: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 03:24:28PM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > On 09/01/2011 03:20 PM, Hugo Mills wrote: > > > You may have missed the "on vacation" bit. > >=20 > > I did read the "on vacation" bit. Not that it is any of my business= , > > but how long is that vacation? >=20 > Your guess is as good as mine. It's only been two weeks... >=20 > > > The canonical place to look for btrfsck updates is the relevan= t > > > FAQ > > > > > >item on the btrfs wiki. > >=20 > > I know this. No need to repeat it. I'm not a complete idiot. >=20 > I never claimed you were. Many people either don't realise that > that is the right place, or don't realise that it really is updated > pretty much as soon as possible with all the information that's been > made public on the subject. Well, I do think that a release of the fsck for BTRFS is important enou= gh=20 to announce it on this mailinglist, too ;). =46ortunately I didn=B4t have any major problems so far. I once had to = use=20 btrfs-zero-log. And I am still not using BTRFS for my main machine=B4s = home=20 directory. For this I intend to wait till it is marked stable in kernel= =20 sources + fsck available. --=20 Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html