From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:06:58 +0200 Subject: [GIT PULL] at91: changes for next In-Reply-To: <4E6A09D0.40800@atmel.com> References: <4E6A09D0.40800@atmel.com> Message-ID: <201109102306.58340.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 09 September 2011, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Can you please pull the following changes since commit ddf28352b80c86754a6424e3a61e8bdf9213b3c7: > > Linux 3.1-rc5 (2011-09-04 15:45:10 -0700) > > They are available in the git repository at: > git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git at91-next > > They have been present on linux-arm-kernel for some time and where recently added in linux-next. > Stephen resolved some trivial conflicts relatives to the removal of a board file (Cf: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/9/96 ). > > A series by Thomas is touching the USB subsystem: ohci-at91.c but as most of changes are in the at91 directory, it makes more sense to take them in arm-soc. Hi Nicolas, I've resumed pulling patches and uploaded them to git.linaro.org while master.kernel.org continues to be unavailable. I've decided to split your branch into two separate branches 'board' and 'devel' to better match the code from other soc trees in a way that I can send forward to Linus. Please check that the split trees actually make sense, and tell me if that's ok for you or if you would prefer them split differently. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934087Ab1IJVKC (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 17:10:02 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:49209 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934050Ab1IJVKA (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 17:10:00 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Nicolas Ferre Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: changes for next Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 23:06:58 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.35-22-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: "Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD" , "'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org'" , Linux Kernel list , Josef Holzmayr , Nico Erfurth , Thomas Petazzoni , Andrew Victor References: <4E6A09D0.40800@atmel.com> In-Reply-To: <4E6A09D0.40800@atmel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201109102306.58340.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:03dJDuvwP7uCURypKHOXRAtFHNDUzVjCnhl6rEJiCHy xM8nF62U1LLLGXZ5Y7PNN8+fZsc+sVoi06RZ3JfWdZrnWomLQ5 TyoTxCBcxlobw6dfeaJYfTl3bbTZ+OpnSfFFF1GwO43ZL+fDPe mq+p0MI/YBKa7HMwVpw/eYuqFvBCdSH7SnbGnIDwBjCJcbOdHt X/oZHgio5P3apwxstE5sj/90nogwqGccLn4hXG7FsLD48VrDsz OcBFXYox5W4u07P0QI1kOAFrmZVvE7S//jfcfM0nKo+Eig1p3Z +mb5+U3ki55VAixcxha/aqHXugDETLWrve1bA1rioVbgDlhNRo Cku3cDdJXeOE9GlUMAUw= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 09 September 2011, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > Can you please pull the following changes since commit ddf28352b80c86754a6424e3a61e8bdf9213b3c7: > > Linux 3.1-rc5 (2011-09-04 15:45:10 -0700) > > They are available in the git repository at: > git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git at91-next > > They have been present on linux-arm-kernel for some time and where recently added in linux-next. > Stephen resolved some trivial conflicts relatives to the removal of a board file (Cf: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/9/96 ). > > A series by Thomas is touching the USB subsystem: ohci-at91.c but as most of changes are in the at91 directory, it makes more sense to take them in arm-soc. Hi Nicolas, I've resumed pulling patches and uploaded them to git.linaro.org while master.kernel.org continues to be unavailable. I've decided to split your branch into two separate branches 'board' and 'devel' to better match the code from other soc trees in a way that I can send forward to Linus. Please check that the split trees actually make sense, and tell me if that's ok for you or if you would prefer them split differently. Arnd