All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] xip: use i_mutex for xip_file_fault
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 12:25:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110911112552.GB2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110911111504.GA2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 12:15:04PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:

> write() grabs ->i_mutex on the file it's going to write to.  It uses
> copy_from_user() while holding ->i_mutex; that can end up calling ->fault().
> If your data comes from the same file mmapped in your address space, you
> have xip_write_fault() called while you are in xip_file_write() and *already*
> are holding ->i_mutex on the same inode.  With your patch it will, AFAICS,
> cheerfully deadlock.

Oh, wait...  You are only doing that to write side of pagefault?  That's
better, but not much:

thread 1: mmap the file, modify mapping
thread 2: write() to file

The former will do xip_write_fault() while holding ->mmap_sem.
The latter will do copy_from_user() from xip_file_write(), getting
pagefaults while holding ->i_mutex.

Note that we are grabbing ->mmap_sem and ->i_mutex in opposite orders.
I.e. that will deadlock on you - all you need is threads sharing the
address space.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-11 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-10 15:31 [PATCH, RFC] xip: use i_mutex for xip_file_fault Marco Stornelli
2011-09-10 15:56 ` Al Viro
2011-09-11  8:25   ` Marco Stornelli
2011-09-11 11:15     ` Al Viro
2011-09-11 11:25       ` Al Viro [this message]
2011-09-11 15:57         ` Marco Stornelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110911112552.GB2203@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marco.stornelli@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.