All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Hiroshi KIHIRA <hiro@dump-Storage.net>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] iptables-restore: new option to change the commit timing
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:28:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110912092807.GB2194@1984> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E68C314.3070709@dump-Storage.net>

On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:28:52PM +0900, Hiroshi KIHIRA wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I propose to add a new command line option to iptables-restore.
> The following patch introduces a new command line option which changes
> the timing of the action of table commitment.
> 
> In the situation that some tables are restored, each of tables are
> applied into the kernel space when the COMMIT statement was read from
> the input. If there was a syntax error in rules, iptables-restore
> will end without doing any modification to the table. However the
> table that was already committed into kernel space does not reverted.
> It causes a inconsistency between the tables. (e.g., some marked
> packets are dropped at filter table, but do not marked any packet at
> mangle table)

I think people should call iptables-restore -T to test the rule-set
before, at least the first time the have saved the rule-set, to make
sure that they don't run into inconsistencies.

Applying the rule-set partially for one table may also result in
inconsistencies, so I still don't see what we gain from allowing this.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-12  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-08 13:28 [PATCH RFC] iptables-restore: new option to change the commit timing Hiroshi KIHIRA
2011-09-08 15:00 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-09-08 15:06   ` Eric Dumazet
2011-09-08 15:22     ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-09-09  5:26       ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2011-09-10 17:27       ` Hiroshi KIHIRA
2011-09-12  9:28 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2011-09-12 11:52   ` Hiroshi KIHIRA
2011-09-12 18:19     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110912092807.GB2194@1984 \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=hiro@dump-Storage.net \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.