From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757352Ab1INShb (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:37:31 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55590 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755834Ab1INSh2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:37:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 20:33:54 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Tejun Heo Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, paul@paulmenage.org, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, matthltc@us.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCHSET cgroup] extend threadgroup locking Message-ID: <20110914183354.GA16922@redhat.com> References: <1315159280-25032-1-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> <20110911033536.GO29319@htj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110911033536.GO29319@htj.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Tejun, On 09/11, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Oleg, this one definitely needs your review. The original thread is... > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1187853/focus=1188347 OK, I'll try to read it this week when I get recovered, I am ill now. But I got lost... What about http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1184375 which I didn't read yet? It seems that they conflict with each other. Should I ignore the series above? Probably yes, it surely conflicts with the task-counter patches in -mm. Oleg.