From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R498F-0000Hb-2z for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:25:23 +0200 Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Sep 2011 03:20:10 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,386,1312182000"; d="scan'208";a="53831815" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.120.100]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Sep 2011 03:20:10 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 11:20:09 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-10-generic-pae; KDE/4.6.2; i686; ; ) References: <1316081269.4523.54.camel@mattotaupa> In-Reply-To: <1316081269.4523.54.camel@mattotaupa> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201109151120.09382.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: How to call the old repository: oe.dev or OE classic? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:25:23 -0000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thursday 15 September 2011 11:07:48 Paul Menzel wrote: > it is confusing for outsiders if oe.dev and OE classic are referring to > the same repository or not. I can see how people could be confused, so yes we probably ought to have just one name. > So we need to make up an official name for the old repository. oe.dev or > OE classic? I favor oe.dev, because it is shorter oe-dev/oe.dev being a shortened "org.openembedded.dev" is kind of a relic of the old (was it bitkeeper or monotone?) days prior to git. The benefit of "classic" is it draws attention to the fact that it's deprecated, whereas to me, dev implies that's where development still occurs. So my personal vote is for OE-classic. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre