From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andy Henroid <andrew.d.henroid@intel.com>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v3] rcu: Fix some rcu uses in extended quiescent state
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 12:05:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110917190538.GE2333@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1316270402-19919-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 04:39:57PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> This is an updated set that tries to fix some illegal uses
> of RCU that are made in extended quiescent state, ie: between
> calls of rcu_enter_nohz() and rcu_exit_nohz().
Thank you, Frederic!
I have queued these, and have started testing them.
Thanx, Paul
> Changes:
>
> - Restructuring of the changes in nohz core code. We need to handle
> the case when the tick is not stopped from tick_nohz_idle_enter() but
> from the irq exit path when the irq happens in idle loop. This should
> fix the RCU stall Paul detected after applying my patches.
> The first patch sort of overlaps the simple scope of fixes for RCU
> but I believe it makes the code slightly more simple and optimized
> in the end.
>
> - Rename tick_nohz_enter_idle() into tick_nohz_idle_enter() (same for
> exit). That to stay coherent with usual naming (tips from Peterz on
> the nohz cpuset patchset that needs similar changes).
>
> - Remove the rcu_ext_qs parameter from tick_nohz_idle_exit(). We only
> need it in tick_nohz_idle_enter() because as long as we call
> rcu_enter_nohz() explicitly, we really want to pair it with an explicit
> call to rcu_exit_nohz() (and vice versa), to avoid confusion.
>
> There are still the powerpc fixes that are not included. But I would
> like to first get this set merged in Paul's tree before focusing on
> the powerpc reported issues.
>
> Frederic Weisbecker (5):
> nohz: Seperate out irq exit and idle loop dyntick logic
> nohz: Allow rcu extended state handling seperately from tick stop
> x86: Enter rcu extended qs after idle notifier call
> x86: Call idle notifier after irq_enter()
> rcu: Fix early call to rcu_irq_exit()
>
> arch/arm/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/avr32/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/blackfin/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/microblaze/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/mips/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c | 4 +-
> arch/powerpc/platforms/iseries/setup.c | 8 +-
> arch/s390/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/sh/kernel/idle.c | 4 +-
> arch/sparc/kernel/process_64.c | 4 +-
> arch/tile/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/um/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/unicore32/kernel/process.c | 4 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 6 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/threshold.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 6 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 4 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 9 ++-
> include/linux/tick.h | 12 ++-
> kernel/softirq.c | 4 +-
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 24 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-17 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-17 14:39 [PATCH 0/5 v3] rcu: Fix some rcu uses in extended quiescent state Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-17 14:39 ` [PATCH 1/5] nohz: Seperate out irq exit and idle loop dyntick logic Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-17 14:39 ` [PATCH 2/5] nohz: Allow rcu extended state handling seperately from tick stop Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-17 14:40 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86: Enter rcu extended qs after idle notifier call Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-17 14:40 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: Call idle notifier after irq_enter() Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-17 14:40 ` [PATCH 5/5] rcu: Fix early call to rcu_irq_exit() Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-17 19:05 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110917190538.GE2333@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=andrew.d.henroid@intel.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn \
--cc=hans-christian.egtvedt@atmel.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.