From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, paul@paulmenage.org, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, fweisbec@gmail.com,
matthltc@us.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
Ben Blum <bblum@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] threadgroup: extend threadgroup_lock() to cover exit and exec
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:46:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110918184613.GA6159@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110918173723.GA2384@redhat.com>
On 09/18, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Of course I am in no position to ack the changes in this code, I do not
> fell I understand it enough. But afaics this series is fine.
^^^^
I do not feel ;)
> If I am right, afaics the only change 4/4 needs is that it should not add
> WARN_ON_ONCE(tsk->flags & PF_EXITING) into cgroup_task_migrate().
Hmm. Unless I missed something this WARN_ON_ONCE() is not right anyway,
because
> - * Call holding cgroup_mutex. May take task_lock of
> - * the task 'tsk' during call.
> + * Call with cgroup_mutex and threadgroup locked. May take task_lock of
> + * @tsk during call.
> */
> int cgroup_attach_task(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *tsk)
this is not true, cgroup_attach_proc() has other callers.
cgroup_attach_task_all() is probably fine, tsk should be current.
but cpuset_do_move_task() doesn't look fine at first glance, we can race
with the exiting task.
And this leads to another question about the cgroup_mutex/threadgroup_lock
nesting...
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-18 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-04 18:01 [PATCHSET cgroup] extend threadgroup locking Tejun Heo
2011-09-04 18:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] cgroup: change locking order in attach_task_by_pid() Tejun Heo
2011-09-04 18:01 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-18 18:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-10-10 17:34 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-10 17:43 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-04 18:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] threadgroup: rename signal->threadgroup_fork_lock to ->group_rwsem Tejun Heo
2011-09-04 18:01 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <1315159280-25032-1-git-send-email-htejun-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-04 18:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] cgroup: change locking order in attach_task_by_pid() Tejun Heo
2011-09-04 18:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] threadgroup: rename signal->threadgroup_fork_lock to ->group_rwsem Tejun Heo
2011-09-04 18:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] threadgroup: extend threadgroup_lock() to cover exit and exec Tejun Heo
2011-09-04 18:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] cgroup: always lock threadgroup during migration Tejun Heo
2011-09-05 4:05 ` [PATCHSET cgroup] extend threadgroup locking Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-06 9:00 ` Li Zefan
2011-09-11 3:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-04 18:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] threadgroup: extend threadgroup_lock() to cover exit and exec Tejun Heo
2011-09-04 18:01 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-12 4:04 ` Paul Menage
2011-09-13 7:54 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-18 17:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-09-18 18:46 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-10-08 18:37 ` Ben Blum
2011-10-10 17:11 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-12 17:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-10-12 18:05 ` Ben Blum
2011-10-12 18:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-10-12 18:44 ` Ben Blum
2011-10-12 19:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-09-04 18:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] cgroup: always lock threadgroup during migration Tejun Heo
2011-09-04 18:01 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-18 17:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-10-10 17:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-05 4:05 ` [PATCHSET cgroup] extend threadgroup locking Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-05 4:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-05 8:43 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <201109050605.57360.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-05 8:43 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-05 8:43 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-06 9:00 ` Li Zefan
2011-09-06 9:00 ` Li Zefan
2011-09-11 3:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-14 18:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-09-14 23:33 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-11 3:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-12 4:11 ` Paul Menage
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110918184613.GA6159@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bblum@andrew.cmu.edu \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.