From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] cgroups: Add res counter common ancestor searching Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 22:59:32 +0300 Message-ID: <20110918195932.GD28057@shutemov.name> References: <1315869091-18933-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1315869091-18933-7-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1315869091-18933-7-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Andrew Morton , LKML , Containers , Li Zefan , Johannes Weiner , Aditya Kali , Oleg Nesterov , Kay Sievers , Tim Hockin , Tejun Heo List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 01:11:26AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > Add a new API to find the common ancestor between two resource > counters. This includes the passed resource counter themselves. > > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker > Acked-by: Paul Menage > Cc: Li Zefan > Cc: Johannes Weiner > Cc: Aditya Kali > Cc: Oleg Nesterov > Cc: Andrew Morton > Cc: Kay Sievers > Cc: Tim Hockin > Cc: Tejun Heo > --- > include/linux/res_counter.h | 3 +++ > kernel/res_counter.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/res_counter.h b/include/linux/res_counter.h > index de4ba29..558f39b 100644 > --- a/include/linux/res_counter.h > +++ b/include/linux/res_counter.h > @@ -147,6 +147,9 @@ static inline void res_counter_uncharge(struct res_counter *counter, > res_counter_uncharge_until(counter, NULL, val); > } > > +struct res_counter *res_counter_common_ancestor(struct res_counter *l, > + struct res_counter *r); > + > /** > * res_counter_margin - calculate chargeable space of a counter > * @cnt: the counter > diff --git a/kernel/res_counter.c b/kernel/res_counter.c > index 0cc9c7e..22f07cc 100644 > --- a/kernel/res_counter.c > +++ b/kernel/res_counter.c > @@ -91,6 +91,28 @@ void res_counter_uncharge_until(struct res_counter *counter, > local_irq_restore(flags); > } > > +/* > + * Walk through r1 and r2 parents and try to find the closest common one > + * between both. If none is found, it returns NULL. > + */ > +struct res_counter * > +res_counter_common_ancestor(struct res_counter *r1, struct res_counter *r2) > +{ > + struct res_counter *iter; > + > + while (r1) { > + iter = r2; > + while (iter) { > + if (iter == r1) > + return iter; > + iter = iter->parent; > + } > + > + r1 = r1->parent; > + } > + > + return NULL; > +} Your implementation is O(n*m). What about: struct res_counter * res_counter_common_ancestor(struct res_counter *r1, struct res_counter *r2) { struct res_counter *iter; int r1_depth = 0, r2_depth = 0; for (iter = r1; iter; iter = iter->parent) r1_depth++; for (iter = r2; iter; iter = iter->parent) r2_depth++; while (r1_depth > r2_depth) { r1 = r1->parent; r1_depth--; } while (r2_depth > r1_depth) { r2 = r2->parent; r2_depth--; } while (r1 != r2) { r1 = r1->parent; r2 = r2->parent; } return r1; } Untested. It's O(n+m). -- Kirill A. Shutemov