All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20110919144657.GA5928@albatros>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index d2cf2b2..dbb9e32 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -4,15 +4,15 @@ On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 17:30 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
 > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:27 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
 > >> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 08:41:34PM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
 > >> > Historically /proc/slabinfo has 0444 permissions and is accessible to
-> >> > the world.  slabinfo contains rather private information related both to
-> >> > the kernel and userspace tasks.  Depending on the situation, it might
+> >> > the world.  slabinfo contains rather private information related both to
+> >> > the kernel and userspace tasks.  Depending on the situation, it might
 > >> > reveal either private information per se or information useful to make
-> >> > another targeted attack.  Some examples of what can be learned by
+> >> > another targeted attack.  Some examples of what can be learned by
 > >> > reading/watching for /proc/slabinfo entries:
 > >> > ...
 > >> > World readable slabinfo simplifies kernel developers' job of debugging
 > >> > kernel bugs (e.g. memleaks), but I believe it does more harm than
-> >> > benefits.  For most users 0444 slabinfo is an unreasonable attack vector.
+> >> > benefits.  For most users 0444 slabinfo is an unreasonable attack vector.
 > >> >
 > >> > Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
 > 
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 17:30 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
 > >> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@ubuntu.com>
 > >
 > > Looks like the members of the previous slabinfo discussion don't object
-> > against the patch now and it got two other Reviewed-by responses.  Can
+> > against the patch now and it got two other Reviewed-by responses.  Can
 > > you merge it as-is or should I probably convince someone else?
 > 
 > We discussed this in March (google for 'Make /proc/slabinfo 0400')
@@ -50,3 +50,10 @@ Thanks,
 -- 
 Vasiliy Kulikov
 http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
+
+--
+To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
+the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
+see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
+Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
+Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 163bb2e..8c33aab 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -29,15 +29,15 @@
  "> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:27 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:\n"
  "> >> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 08:41:34PM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:\n"
  "> >> > Historically /proc/slabinfo has 0444 permissions and is accessible to\n"
- "> >> > the world. \302\240slabinfo contains rather private information related both to\n"
- "> >> > the kernel and userspace tasks. \302\240Depending on the situation, it might\n"
+ "> >> > the world.  slabinfo contains rather private information related both to\n"
+ "> >> > the kernel and userspace tasks.  Depending on the situation, it might\n"
  "> >> > reveal either private information per se or information useful to make\n"
- "> >> > another targeted attack. \302\240Some examples of what can be learned by\n"
+ "> >> > another targeted attack.  Some examples of what can be learned by\n"
  "> >> > reading/watching for /proc/slabinfo entries:\n"
  "> >> > ...\n"
  "> >> > World readable slabinfo simplifies kernel developers' job of debugging\n"
  "> >> > kernel bugs (e.g. memleaks), but I believe it does more harm than\n"
- "> >> > benefits. \302\240For most users 0444 slabinfo is an unreasonable attack vector.\n"
+ "> >> > benefits.  For most users 0444 slabinfo is an unreasonable attack vector.\n"
  "> >> >\n"
  "> >> > Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>\n"
  "> \n"
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
  "> >> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@ubuntu.com>\n"
  "> >\n"
  "> > Looks like the members of the previous slabinfo discussion don't object\n"
- "> > against the patch now and it got two other Reviewed-by responses. \302\240Can\n"
+ "> > against the patch now and it got two other Reviewed-by responses.  Can\n"
  "> > you merge it as-is or should I probably convince someone else?\n"
  "> \n"
  "> We discussed this in March (google for 'Make /proc/slabinfo 0400')\n"
@@ -74,6 +74,13 @@
  "\n"
  "-- \n"
  "Vasiliy Kulikov\n"
- http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
+ "http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments\n"
+ "\n"
+ "--\n"
+ "To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in\n"
+ "the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,\n"
+ "see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .\n"
+ "Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/\n"
+ "Don't email: <a href=mailto:\"dont@kvack.org\"> email@kvack.org </a>"
 
-d3d4d5fac294b961e3f050ad1ffdbfefe9d452cacf7e548595bf4f4b6942d963
+aeade1de45cfca8f6f90c3bb4d897b5a04d071673e054413fa872b66ad0fd438

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.