From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] hwspinlock-next Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:45:15 -0700 Message-ID: <20110920234515.GA16276@kroah.com> References: <1315846025-11453-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <20110920231340.GT18894@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:41707 "EHLO out2.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751825Ab1IUPAg (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Sep 2011 11:00:36 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110920231340.GT18894@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen , Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann , Russell King , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Linus Walleij , Linus Torvalds , Nicolas Pitre , Thomas Gleixner , Stephen Rothwell , Grant Likely On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 04:13:40PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Ohad Ben-Cohen [110920 01:34]: > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > > > > I'm wondering how hwspinlock updates like this should go upstream. > > > > The first hwspinlock batch was picked by Tony, because it involved a > > bulk of OMAP changes. > > > > Hwspinlock isn't OMAP-specific anymore though (we gained support for > > STE's u8500) and the vast majority of changes are in drivers/. We're > > still very much ARM-related, though this may change too at some point > > (c6x has a similar "hardware semaphore" peripheral like the u8500 > > does). > > > > Tony, if you're still willing to pick up these updates I'd be happy to > > send you pull requests of course. > > I'd prefer for Greg to take these as these are drivers. What, am I the catch-all for drivers these days? Oh, right, it looks like I am :) > If he's not taking it at this point based on it being ARM only, > I can take it then. Please do, I don't even have the ability to build them here, as I don't have an arm cross-compiler on this travel laptop. greg k-h From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: greg@kroah.com (Greg KH) Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:45:15 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 00/10] hwspinlock-next In-Reply-To: <20110920231340.GT18894@atomide.com> References: <1315846025-11453-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <20110920231340.GT18894@atomide.com> Message-ID: <20110920234515.GA16276@kroah.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 04:13:40PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Ohad Ben-Cohen [110920 01:34]: > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > > > > I'm wondering how hwspinlock updates like this should go upstream. > > > > The first hwspinlock batch was picked by Tony, because it involved a > > bulk of OMAP changes. > > > > Hwspinlock isn't OMAP-specific anymore though (we gained support for > > STE's u8500) and the vast majority of changes are in drivers/. We're > > still very much ARM-related, though this may change too at some point > > (c6x has a similar "hardware semaphore" peripheral like the u8500 > > does). > > > > Tony, if you're still willing to pick up these updates I'd be happy to > > send you pull requests of course. > > I'd prefer for Greg to take these as these are drivers. What, am I the catch-all for drivers these days? Oh, right, it looks like I am :) > If he's not taking it at this point based on it being ARM only, > I can take it then. Please do, I don't even have the ability to build them here, as I don't have an arm cross-compiler on this travel laptop. greg k-h