From: Jim Rees <rees@umich.edu>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@tonian.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, peter honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] pnfs: introduce pnfs private workqueue
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:29:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110921002917.GA30770@merit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1316558461.15093.4.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 23:18 -0400, Jim Rees wrote:
> From: Peng Tao <bergwolf@gmail.com>
>
> For layoutdriver io done functions, default workqueue is not a good place as
> the code is executed in IO path. So add a pnfs private workqueue to handle
> them.
>
> Also change block and object layout code to make use of this private
> workqueue.
>
Wait, what????
Why is the I/O path (i.e. the nfsiod queue) inappropriate for
layoutdriver io_done functions?
I thought you were the one who asked for this, here:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-nfs/msg22771.html
But looking back on it now, the IO path has changed and I can't tell if the
argument still holds.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-21 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-20 3:18 [PATCH 0/3] replacement for "introduce pnfs private workqueue" Jim Rees
2011-09-20 3:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] pnfsblock: add missing rpc_put_mount and path_put Jim Rees
2011-09-20 3:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] pnfs: introduce pnfs private workqueue Jim Rees
2011-09-20 22:41 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-09-21 0:29 ` Jim Rees [this message]
2011-09-21 2:44 ` tao.peng
2011-09-21 4:20 ` Myklebust, Trond
2011-09-21 5:16 ` tao.peng
2011-09-21 7:04 ` Benny Halevy
2011-09-21 10:23 ` tao.peng
2011-09-21 10:38 ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-09-21 11:04 ` tao.peng
2011-09-21 10:56 ` Benny Halevy
2011-09-21 11:10 ` tao.peng
2011-09-21 11:27 ` Benny Halevy
2011-09-21 11:42 ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-09-21 11:50 ` Benny Halevy
2011-09-21 13:56 ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-09-21 15:45 ` Peng Tao
2011-09-21 16:03 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-09-22 3:30 ` tao.peng
2011-09-22 7:17 ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-09-21 4:22 ` Myklebust, Trond
2011-09-20 3:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] SQUASHME: pnfs: simplify and clean up pnfsiod workqueue Jim Rees
2011-09-21 11:52 ` [PATCH 0/3] replacement for "introduce pnfs private workqueue" Benny Halevy
2011-09-21 12:32 ` Jim Rees
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-09-10 17:41 [PATCH 0/3] pnfs private workqueue, and two cleanups Jim Rees
2011-09-10 17:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] pNFS: introduce pnfs private workqueue Jim Rees
2011-09-11 14:51 ` Benny Halevy
2011-09-11 15:15 ` Benny Halevy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110921002917.GA30770@merit.edu \
--to=rees@umich.edu \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=bhalevy@tonian.com \
--cc=honey@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.