All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"avi@redhat.com" <avi@redhat.com>,
	"jeremy@goop.org" <jeremy@goop.org>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>, Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [V5][PATCH 3/6] x86, nmi: wire up NMI handlers to new routines
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:06:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110921140609.GQ5795@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110921104935.GA2451@gere.osrc.amd.com>

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:49:36PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> + Tony.
> 
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:41:39PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > On 09/20/2011 10:43 PM, Don Zickus wrote:
> > > Just convert all the files that have an nmi handler to the new routines.
> > > Most of it is straight forward conversion.  A couple of places needed some
> > > tweaking like kgdb which separates the debug notifier from the nmi handler
> > > and mce removes a call to notify_die (as I couldn't figure out why it was
> > > there).
> > 
> > It is used to call a debugger on a machine check, according to following
> > thread:
> > 
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/27/114
> 
> Thanks for digging that out - I couldn't find anywhere in the git logs
> why was this added in the first place.
> 
> > So maybe we can turn that into a kgdb direct call?
> 
> After reading the thread, the semi-legitimate usage of using it as
> a jump into the debugger just because some hardware reports certain
> conditions through an MCE sounds pretty hacky to me.
> 
> Besides, if the driver developer needs that, he can add the code for the
> duration of her/his development cycle as aid, and remove it in the end.
> 
> This early-exit deal is especially inacceptable if you get an
> uncorrectable error and some notifier call in the chain consumes it and
> we never get to report it or decode it, or do recovery action. And thus
> the box merrily continues on although a corruption just happened and we
> didn't even get a chance to panic.
> 
> So I really really want to remove it, actually.

Cool.  Thanks Ying and Boris for settling that.  I was scratching my head
trying to understand why that was there.  It keeps the code simpler to
now. :-)

Cheers,
Don

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-21 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-20 14:43 [V5][PATCH 0/6] x86, nmi: new NMI handling routines Don Zickus
2011-09-20 14:43 ` [V5][PATCH 1/6] x86, nmi: split out nmi from traps.c Don Zickus
2011-09-20 14:43 ` [V5][PATCH 2/6] x86, nmi: create new NMI handler routines Don Zickus
2011-09-21  5:36   ` Huang Ying
2011-09-21 13:56     ` Don Zickus
2011-09-20 14:43 ` [V5][PATCH 3/6] x86, nmi: wire up NMI handlers to new routines Don Zickus
2011-09-21  5:41   ` Huang Ying
2011-09-21 10:49     ` Borislav Petkov
2011-09-21 14:06       ` Don Zickus [this message]
2011-09-20 14:43 ` [V5][PATCH 4/6] x86, nmi: add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Don Zickus
2011-09-20 17:23   ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-20 20:10     ` Don Zickus
2011-09-21  5:45       ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-21  5:43   ` Huang Ying
2011-09-21 13:57     ` Don Zickus
2011-09-21 10:08   ` Robert Richter
2011-09-21 14:04     ` Don Zickus
2011-09-21 15:18       ` Robert Richter
2011-09-21 15:33         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-21 16:04           ` Robert Richter
2011-09-21 16:40             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-21 16:13         ` Don Zickus
2011-09-21 16:24           ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-21 16:54             ` Robert Richter
2011-09-25 12:54               ` Avi Kivity
2011-09-21 17:10             ` Don Zickus
2011-09-20 14:43 ` [V5][PATCH 5/6] x86, nmi: track NMI usage stats Don Zickus
2011-09-20 14:43 ` [V5][PATCH 6/6] x86, nmi: print out NMI stats in /proc/interrupts Don Zickus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110921140609.GQ5795@redhat.com \
    --to=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@amd64.org \
    --cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=minyard@acm.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=steiner@sgi.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.