Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with Linus' tree

[Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 04:04:11PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c between commit a0bfa1373859 ("cpuidle: stop
> depending on pm_idle") from Linus' tree and commit 18349ca4b42e ("x86:
> Enter rcu extended qs after idle notifier call") from the rcu tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
> 
> diff --cc arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> index f693e44,dee2e6c..0000000
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> @@@ -137,8 -136,12 +137,14 @@@ void cpu_idle(void
>   			enter_idle();
>   			/* Don't trace irqs off for idle */
>   			stop_critical_timings();
> - 			if (cpuidle_idle_call())
> + 
>  -			/* enter_idle() needs rcu for notifiers */
>  -			rcu_enter_nohz();
>  -			pm_idle();
>  -			rcu_exit_nohz();
> ++			if (cpuidle_idle_call()) {
> ++				/* enter_idle() needs rcu for notifiers */
> ++				rcu_enter_nohz();
>  +				pm_idle();
> ++				rcu_exit_nohz();
> ++			}
> + 
>   			start_critical_timings();
>   
>   			/* In many cases the interrupt that ended idle

Looks good, thanks!