From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: MaoXiaoyun <tinnycloud@hotmail.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
xen devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
jack@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] ext4-fix-dirty-extent-when-origin-leaf-extent-reac.patch
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:35:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110927193523.GB3309@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110926142808.GG4102@phenom.oracle.com>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:28:08AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >
> > Attached is the fix, verified in our env.
>
> So.. you are asking for this upstream git commit to be back-ported
> to 2.6.32, right?
I'm curious --- is there a good reason why Xen users are using an
upstream 2.6.32 kernel? If they are using a distro kernel, fine, but
then the distro kernel should be providing the support. But at this
point, 2.6.32 is so positively *ancient* that, I'm personally not
interesting in providing free, unpaid distro support for users who
aren't willing to either (a) pay $$$ and get a supported distro
kernel, or (b) use a much more modern kernel. At this point, Guest
and Host Xen support is available in 3.0 kernels, so there's really no
excuse, right?
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-27 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-06 7:24 ext4 BUG in dom0 Kernel 2.6.32.36 MaoXiaoyun
2011-09-06 7:24 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-09-06 11:33 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-09-06 11:33 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-09-06 14:53 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-06 15:11 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-09-06 15:11 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-09-06 18:55 ` [Xen-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-09-07 2:35 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-09-07 2:35 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-09-16 6:08 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-09-16 6:08 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-09-25 8:45 ` [patch 1/1] ext4-fix-dirty-extent-when-origin-leaf-extent-reac.patch MaoXiaoyun
2011-09-25 8:45 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-09-26 14:28 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-27 2:22 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-09-27 2:22 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-09-27 9:09 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2011-09-27 9:09 ` Jan Beulich
2011-09-27 9:54 ` Tao Ma
2011-09-27 19:35 ` Ted Ts'o [this message]
2011-09-27 23:41 ` Olivier B.
2011-09-28 12:47 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-09-28 4:09 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-09-28 4:09 ` MaoXiaoyun
2011-09-28 10:45 ` [PATCH] ext4: fix BUG_ON() in ext4_ext_insert_extent() Tao Ma
2011-10-27 9:43 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-10-27 11:53 ` Greg KH
2011-10-28 2:36 ` Zheng Liu
2011-10-28 5:24 ` Greg KH
2011-10-28 8:46 ` Zheng Liu
2011-10-28 9:07 ` Greg KH
2011-10-28 12:34 ` [PATCH] ext4: fix BUG_ON() in ext4_ext_insert_extent() for .32 longterm Zheng Liu
2011-11-02 21:00 ` Greg KH
2011-11-03 3:06 ` Zheng Liu
2011-11-03 17:42 ` Greg KH
2011-10-28 12:36 ` [PATCH] ext4: fix BUG_ON() in ext4_ext_insert_extent() for .33 longterm Zheng Liu
2011-09-28 18:41 ` [Xen-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] ext4-fix-dirty-extent-when-origin-leaf-extent-reac.patch Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2011-09-28 19:46 ` Ted Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110927193523.GB3309@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tinnycloud@hotmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.