From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752690Ab1I1Ej2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 00:39:28 -0400 Received: from e9.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.139]:45727 "EHLO e9.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751572Ab1I1Ej1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2011 00:39:27 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:09:21 +0530 From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri To: Venki Pallipadi Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Paul Turner , Ingo Molnar , Vaidyanathan Srinivasan , Kamalesh Babulal , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] sched: fix nohz idle load balancer issues Message-ID: <20110928043921.GC8593@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri References: <20110926115049.GA22604@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110928043427.GI4357@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110928043427.GI4357@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Srivatsa Vaddagiri [2011-09-28 10:04:27]: > unless we want to go for more sophisticated like a sorted list of > rq->next_balance in a rb-tree Given that this list will need to be global (and not per-cpu) and it will need to be updated reqularly (even when cpus are busy and as they update their rq->next_balance), that will probably not fly! - vatsa