From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Reeted <reeted@shiftmail.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, libvir-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [libvirt] Qemu/KVM is 3x slower under libvirt (due to vhost=on)
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:53:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110928095339.GP21102@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E82ED8D.10004@shiftmail.org>
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:49:01AM +0200, Reeted wrote:
> On 09/28/11 11:28, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:19:43AM +0200, Reeted wrote:
> >>On 09/28/11 09:51, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>>>This is my bash commandline:
> >>>>
> >>>>/opt/qemu-kvm-0.14.1/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -M pc-0.14 -enable-kvm
> >>>>-m 2002 -smp 2,sockets=2,cores=1,threads=1 -name vmname1-1 -uuid
> >>>>ee75e28a-3bf3-78d9-3cba-65aa63973380 -nodefconfig -nodefaults
> >>>>-chardev socket,id=charmonitor,path=/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/vmname1-1.monitor,server,nowait
> >>>>-mon chardev=charmonitor,id=monitor,mode=readline -rtc base=utc
> >>>>-boot order=dc,menu=on -drive file=/dev/mapper/vgPtpVM-lvVM_Vmname1_d1,if=none,id=drive-virtio-disk0,boot=on,format=raw,cache=none,aio=native
> >>>>-device virtio-blk-pci,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4,drive=drive-virtio-disk0,id=virtio-disk0
> >>>>-drive if=none,media=cdrom,id=drive-ide0-1-0,readonly=on,format=raw,cache=none,aio=native
> >>>>-device ide-drive,bus=ide.1,unit=0,drive=drive-ide0-1-0,id=ide0-1-0
> >>>>-net nic,model=virtio -net tap,ifname=tap0,script=no,downscript=no
> >>>>-usb -vnc 127.0.0.1:0 -vga cirrus -device
> >>>>virtio-balloon-pci,id=balloon0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x5
> >>>This shows KVM is being requested, but we should validate that KVM is
> >>>definitely being activated when under libvirt. You can test this by
> >>>doing:
> >>>
> >>> virsh qemu-monitor-command vmname1 'info kvm'
> >>kvm support: enabled
> >>
> >>I think I would see a higher impact if it was KVM not enabled.
> >>
> >>>>Which was taken from libvirt's command line. The only modifications
> >>>>I did to the original libvirt commandline (seen with ps aux) were:
> >
> >>>>- Network was: -netdev tap,fd=17,id=hostnet0,vhost=on,vhostfd=18
> >>>>-device virtio-net-pci,netdev=hostnet0,id=net0,mac=52:54:00:05:36:60,bus=pci.0,addr=0x3
> >>>>Has been simplified to: -net nic,model=virtio -net
> >>>>tap,ifname=tap0,script=no,downscript=no
> >>>>and manual bridging of the tap0 interface.
> >>>You could have equivalently used
> >>>
> >>> -netdev tap,ifname=tap0,script=no,downscript=no,id=hostnet0,vhost=on
> >>> -device virtio-net-pci,netdev=hostnet0,id=net0,mac=52:54:00:05:36:60,bus=pci.0,addr=0x3
> >>It's this! It's this!! (thanks for the line)
> >>
> >>It raises boot time by 10-13 seconds
> >Ok, that is truely bizarre and I don't really have any explanation
> >for why that is. I guess you could try 'vhost=off' too and see if that
> >makes the difference.
>
> YES!
> It's the vhost. With vhost=on it takes about 12 seconds more time to boot.
>
> ...meaning? :-)
I've no idea. I was always under the impression that 'vhost=on' was
the 'make it go much faster' switch. So something is going wrong
here that I cna't explain.
Perhaps one of the network people on this list can explain...
To turn vhost off in the libvirt XML, you should be able to use
<driver name='qemu'/> for the interface in question,eg
<interface type='user'>
<mac address='52:54:00:e5:48:58'/>
<model type='virtio'/>
<driver name='qemu'/>
</interface>
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-28 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-27 18:10 Qemu/KVM is 3x slower under libvirt Reeted
2011-09-28 7:51 ` [libvirt] " Daniel P. Berrange
2011-09-28 9:19 ` Reeted
2011-09-28 9:28 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-09-28 9:49 ` Reeted
2011-09-28 9:53 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
2011-09-28 10:19 ` [libvirt] Qemu/KVM is 3x slower under libvirt (due to vhost=on) Reeted
2011-09-28 10:29 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2011-09-28 12:56 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2011-09-28 14:51 ` Reeted
2011-09-28 23:27 ` Reeted
2011-09-29 0:39 ` [libvirt] Qemu/KVM is 3x slower under libvirt Chris Wright
2011-09-29 10:16 ` Reeted
2011-09-29 16:40 ` Chris Wright
2011-10-04 23:12 ` Qemu/KVM guest boots 2x slower with vhost_net Reeted
2011-10-04 23:12 ` [Qemu-devel] " Reeted
2011-10-09 21:47 ` Reeted
2011-10-09 21:47 ` [Qemu-devel] " Reeted
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110928095339.GP21102@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=reeted@shiftmail.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.