From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [libvirt] Qemu/KVM is 3x slower under libvirt (due to vhost=on)
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:29:35 +0100
Message-ID: <20110928102935.GQ21102@redhat.com>
References: <4E82118D.2010702@shiftmail.org>
 <20110928075138.GC21102@redhat.com>
 <4E82E6AF.5070009@shiftmail.org>
 <20110928092859.GO21102@redhat.com>
 <4E82ED8D.10004@shiftmail.org>
 <20110928095339.GP21102@redhat.com>
 <4E82F49D.5000304@shiftmail.org>
Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, libvir-list@redhat.com
To: Reeted <reeted@shiftmail.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1632 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750765Ab1I1K3q (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 28 Sep 2011 06:29:46 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4E82F49D.5000304@shiftmail.org>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:19:09PM +0200, Reeted wrote:
> On 09/28/11 11:53, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:49:01AM +0200, Reeted wrote:
> >>YES!
> >>It's the vhost. With vhost=on it takes about 12 seconds more time to boot.
> >>
> >>...meaning? :-)
> >I've no idea. I was always under the impression that 'vhost=on' was
> >the 'make it go much faster' switch. So something is going wrong
> >here that I cna't explain.
> >
> >Perhaps one of the network people on this list can explain...
> >
> >
> >To turn vhost off in the libvirt XML, you should be able to use
> ><driver name='qemu'/>  for the interface in question,eg
> >
> >
> >     <interface type='user'>
> >       <mac address='52:54:00:e5:48:58'/>
> >       <model type='virtio'/>
> >       <driver name='qemu'/>
> >     </interface>
> 
> 
> Ok that seems to work: it removes the vhost part in the virsh launch
> hence cutting down 12secs of boot time.
> 
> If nobody comes out with an explanation of why, I will open another
> thread on the kvm list for this. I would probably need to test disk
> performance on vhost=on to see if it degrades or it's for another
> reason that boot time is increased.

Be sure to CC the qemu-devel mailing list too next time, since that has
a wider audience who might be able to help


Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|