From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: dmidecode doesn't work under xen 4.1.1 on certain
	hardware
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:32:54 -0400
Message-ID: <20110928163254.GA16348@phenom.oracle.com>
References: <4E7C6BDC.8070005@overnetdata.com>
	<20110923133200.GC19579@phenom.oracle.com>
	<4E7C9C8B.2010108@overnetdata.com>
	<20110926141322.GD4102@phenom.oracle.com>
	<4E8090D4.2090009@overnetdata.com>
	<20110926193732.GA10007@phenom.oracle.com>
	<4E82E429.2080600@overnetdata.com>
	<20110928132815.GE10270@phenom.oracle.com>
	<4E83462B.9080002@overnetdata.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4E83462B.9080002@overnetdata.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Anthony Wright <anthony@overnetdata.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 05:07:07PM +0100, Anthony Wright wrote:
> On 28/09/2011 14:28, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >>>> (XEN) WARNING: Only the first 16 GB of the physical memory map can be accessed by Xen in 32-bit mode.
> >>> That bites ^^^^
> >>>> (XEN) Truncating RAM from 17825792kB to 16777216kB
> >> Does this mean that 32 bit Xen can only use a maximum of 16GB of RAM?
> >>
> >> If so, is there a way to use 32 bit Xen tools with a 64 bit Xen hypervisor?
> > Yes. I've been doing that without any trouble.
> I tried to get this so work some time ago and failed. Do I need a 64 bit
> Dom0 kernel with a 64 bit xen hypervisor or can I get away with a 32 bit
> Dom0 kernel?

You can get away with a 32-bit dom0 kernel.

> >> The patch works perfectly. I've attached a copy of the kernel log with
> >> 'debug loglevel=8'
> > Yeeey! Great. Thanks for testing it. We are re-doing that whole E820 parsing
> > for the next version of Linux (3.2) so will integrate the "essence" of that
> > patch.
> >
> > Would you be up for testing a different variant of that patch just to make
> > sure?
> Not a problem, ship me the patch when you're ready. I'm running 3.0.4 at
> the moment and would prefer to stick with 3.0.x for now, so hope that
> won't be a problem.

Ok. Thx!