All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Cc: Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] multipath: better check for daemon mode.
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:38:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110929033812.GZ24133@ether.msp.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110901024632.GB11793@ether.msp.redhat.com>

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:46:32PM -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> Christophe, would it be possible to get this merged?

Is there some objection to merging this?  It's not just a cosmetic
change.  For multipath devices added via ev_add_map(), disassemble_map()
will be called before the waiter thread is started, and this check will
allow any unknown paths in the device to be stored.  However, paths
added this way never get properly setup like they do when they are added
via ev_add_path(), or at configuration time.

So say you had a multipath device, "mpatha", which should include the
path "sda", except that the path was mistakenly blacklisted. If you
unblacklist the path and then run multipath, without first reconfiguring
multipathd, it will segfault, since it adds sda, but never initializes
all the necessary information.

We could solve this problem by making sure that paths added through
disassemble_map() go through the same initialization code that paths
added through ev_add_path(), but I don't see the necessity. If
multipathd isn't monitoring a path, it's either because that path was
blacklisted, or because that path was manually removed.  While it's
possible to create a multipath device using blacklisted paths via
dmsetup, multipathd still shouldn't be monitoring those paths.  The same
goes with paths that were manually removed via the multipathd command
line interface.

And if, for some reason, multipathd wasn't monitoring a path it should
be, the best thing to do is to reconfigure multipathd.  Code that
watched multipath.conf and automatically reconfigured multipathd when it
changed would be a nice addition though.

Thanks,
-Ben

> Thanks,
> -Ben
> 
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 01:47:52PM -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> > Switching to conf->daemon to check if we are in daemon mode.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  libmultipath/dmparser.c |    3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > Index: multipath-tools-110713/libmultipath/dmparser.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- multipath-tools-110713.orig/libmultipath/dmparser.c
> > +++ multipath-tools-110713/libmultipath/dmparser.c
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> >  #include "structs.h"
> >  #include "util.h"
> >  #include "debug.h"
> > +#include "config.h"
> >  
> >  #define WORD_SIZE 64
> >  
> > @@ -330,7 +331,7 @@ disassemble_map (vector pathvec, char * 
> >  				strncpy(pp->dev_t, word, BLK_DEV_SIZE);
> >  
> >  				/* Only call this in multipath client mode */
> > -				if (!mpp->waiter && store_path(pathvec, pp))
> > +				if (!conf->daemon && store_path(pathvec, pp))
> >  					goto out1;
> >  			}
> >  			FREE(word);
> > 
> > --
> > dm-devel mailing list
> > dm-devel@redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
> 
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-29  3:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-25 18:47 [PATCH] multipath: better check for daemon mode Benjamin Marzinski
2011-09-01  2:46 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2011-09-29  3:38   ` Benjamin Marzinski [this message]
2011-09-30  5:58     ` Christophe Varoqui
2011-09-30 15:08       ` Benjamin Marzinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110929033812.GZ24133@ether.msp.redhat.com \
    --to=bmarzins@redhat.com \
    --cc=christophe.varoqui@gmail.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.