From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: William Thompson Subject: Network problem with bridge and virtualbox Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:49:41 -0400 Message-ID: <20110929124941.GA16567@electro-mechanical.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail.electro-mechanical.com ([216.184.71.30]:56805 "EHLO mail.electro-mechanical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754739Ab1I2NGV (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:06:21 -0400 Received: from root by mail.electro-mechanical.com with local (Exim 4.69 #1 (Debian)) id 1R9G3Z-0005n2-S2 for netdev@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:49:41 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Please keep me in the CC as I am not subscribed. I'm using a 64-bit kernel 3.0.0 and virtualbox 4.1.2. My problem is that I cannot ping the host from a virtual machine. My bridge is configured as follows: # brctl addbr br0 # brctl setfd br0 0 # brctl stp br0 off # ifconfig br0 10.2.3.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 In the virtual machine, it is set to use br0 as it's interface (bridge mode) and it's IP is 10.2.3.10. The host gets packets from the vm, but the vm does not receive packets back. I have this same setup working on a 32-bit kernel 2.6.38.6 on another machine with virtualbox 4.0.4. I had a thought that the bridge on the host wasn't responding due to having no ports configured so I added one of my spare ethernet cards to it as follows: # brctl addif br0 eth1 # ifconfig eth1 up The card was plugged into a switch. After doing this, the vm still could not talk to the host. I added a physical machine to the switch that eth1 was connected to and configured it to 10.2.3.2. I was able to ping 10.2.3.2 but not 10.2.3.1