From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcc-4.6: drop/update few patches from gcc-4_6-branch-linaro-backports.inc
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:26:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110929142643.GD5030@jama.jama.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMKF1spa2wDNGzmOxPPhxEKKyHGo1RxjLEkNasfk8vP+65PFFg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4723 bytes --]
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 07:18:15AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:57 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> > * they need to be rebased after
> > http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core/commit/?id=ed7deecb9503420fbf8071445e077c32beda8dc4
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
>
> I had a patch which should have addressed it. I was waiting for update in core
> can you try this one out ? this should address this issue as well.
>
> http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/12407/
Thanks, I'll try your patch.. not sure why I haven't seen it on ML (or
was it sent just now? - if yes, can you please send such patch at the
same time as patch for oe-core? so people willing to test it can do it
before applying oe-core patch?).
Regards,
>
> > ---
> > .../gcc-4.6/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106741.patch | 4 ++--
> > .../gcc-4.6/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106742.patch | 9 ++++-----
> > .../gcc/gcc-4_6-branch-linaro-backports.inc | 2 --
> > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106741.patch b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106741.patch
> > index 84f6f64..f76914f 100644
> > --- a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106741.patch
> > +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106741.patch
> > @@ -188,8 +188,8 @@
> > {
> > /* Try to simplify the expression further. */
> > rtx tor = simplify_gen_binary (IOR, mode, XEXP (x, 0), XEXP (x, 1));
> > -- temp = combine_simplify_rtx (tor, mode, in_dest);
> > -+ temp = combine_simplify_rtx (tor, mode, in_dest, 0);
> > +- temp = combine_simplify_rtx (tor, VOIDmode, in_dest);
> > ++ temp = combine_simplify_rtx (tor, VOIDmode, in_dest, 0);
> >
> > /* If we could, great. If not, do not go ahead with the IOR
> > replacement, since PLUS appears in many special purpose
> > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106742.patch b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106742.patch
> > index d14f06c..836b76f 100644
> > --- a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106742.patch
> > +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106742.patch
> > @@ -1582,15 +1582,14 @@
> > === modified file 'gcc/config/arm/predicates.md'
> > --- old/gcc/config/arm/predicates.md 2011-04-07 10:52:12 +0000
> > +++ new/gcc/config/arm/predicates.md 2011-05-03 15:14:56 +0000
> > -@@ -683,3 +683,7 @@
> > - }
> > - return true;
> > - })
> > +@@ -686,3 +686,7 @@
> > +
> > + (define_special_predicate "add_operator"
> > + (match_code "plus"))
> > +
> > +(define_special_predicate "neon_struct_operand"
> > + (and (match_code "mem")
> > + (match_test "TARGET_32BIT && neon_vector_mem_operand (op, 2)")))
> > -
> > === modified file 'gcc/doc/tm.texi'
> > --- old/gcc/doc/tm.texi 2011-01-22 19:35:10 +0000
> > +++ new/gcc/doc/tm.texi 2011-05-03 15:17:25 +0000
> > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4_6-branch-linaro-backports.inc b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4_6-branch-linaro-backports.inc
> > index 86dceab..e256e15 100644
> > --- a/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4_6-branch-linaro-backports.inc
> > +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4_6-branch-linaro-backports.inc
> > @@ -21,11 +21,9 @@ file://linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106755.patch \
> > file://linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106759.patch \
> > file://linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106761.patch \
> > file://linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106762.patch \
> > -file://linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106763.patch \
> > file://linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106764.patch \
> > file://linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106766.patch \
> > file://linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106768.patch \
> > -file://linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106769.patch \
> > file://linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106770.patch \
> > file://linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106771.patch \
> > file://linaro/gcc-4.6-linaro-r106772.patch \
> > --
> > 1.7.6.1
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-devel mailing list
> > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-29 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-29 9:28 gcc-4.6 patches in meta-oe need to be rebased on new oe-core revision Martin Jansa
2011-09-29 13:57 ` [PATCH] gcc-4.6: drop/update few patches from gcc-4_6-branch-linaro-backports.inc Martin Jansa
2011-09-29 14:18 ` Khem Raj
2011-09-29 14:26 ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2011-10-03 19:13 ` Khem Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110929142643.GD5030@jama.jama.net \
--to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.