From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757436Ab1I2TBa (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:01:30 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:58304 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754200Ab1I2TB3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:01:29 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:58:19 -0700 From: Greg KH To: David Henningsson Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, stable-review@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: [228/244] ALSA: HDA: No power nids on 92HD93 Message-ID: <20110929185819.GC8183@suse.de> References: <20110928220149.403768579@clark.kroah.org> <4E83FA65.8060600@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E83FA65.8060600@canonical.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 06:56:05AM +0200, David Henningsson wrote: > Hi Greg, > > thanks for applying this patch, but it makes little sense to do so > without the other patch "ALSA: HDA: Add support for IDT 92HD93" > (46724c2e023cb7ba5cd50) added a few days earlier (with cc to > stable). > > Can you tell me why the above patch was not applied, and in case it > did not apply cleanly, the location of the tree I need to fix it up > against? Odd, I somehow missed that one, my mistake. There was a period there where I was picking the patches out of the tree by hand until I got the system automated again with the changes needed due to the kernel.org disruption. I've added the above patch to the tree now, thanks for letting me know. greg k-h