diff for duplicates of <20111003140824.GM3731@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 999eacd..e42ed47 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -2,16 +2,10 @@ "ref\01869072.QQLATNzYYx@wuerfel\0" "ref\020111003120741.GD23811@sirena.org.uk\0" "ref\011174515.ANsqIhx0NX@wuerfel\0" - "From\0Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 5/6] ASoC: samsung: wm8994 depends on mfd_wm8994\0" + "From\0broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH 5/6] ASoC: samsung: wm8994 depends on mfd_wm8994\0" "Date\0Mon, 3 Oct 2011 15:08:24 +0100\0" - "To\0Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>\0" - "Cc\0alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" - Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@samsung.com> - 'Jassi Brar' <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com> - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org - 'Liam Girdwood' <lrg@ti.com> - " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 03:43:10PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:\n" @@ -24,4 +18,4 @@ "something that can be applied against -next which this patch can't be,\n" this doesn't feel like something we should be rushing into 3.1. -a60b54165b3966f06968934e8a8967b93e8a48e934e83eb906d1e54245ec7a50 +154f048726148a889dc4afb004916f083bc135db47db23b4c4a3200740fb850f
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 999eacd..4542c64 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -6,12 +6,12 @@ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 5/6] ASoC: samsung: wm8994 depends on mfd_wm8994\0" "Date\0Mon, 3 Oct 2011 15:08:24 +0100\0" "To\0Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>\0" - "Cc\0alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" + "Cc\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" + alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@samsung.com> 'Jassi Brar' <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org - 'Liam Girdwood' <lrg@ti.com> - " linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + " 'Liam Girdwood' <lrg@ti.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 03:43:10PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:\n" @@ -24,4 +24,4 @@ "something that can be applied against -next which this patch can't be,\n" this doesn't feel like something we should be rushing into 3.1. -a60b54165b3966f06968934e8a8967b93e8a48e934e83eb906d1e54245ec7a50 +553ab5de69d70ca47f11b7e19924aa4b91bc1947855e1869a576bfe6c52157ea
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.