From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/30] mfd: build twl6030 only on omap2 Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:47:02 +0200 Message-ID: <201110041647.02690.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1317566760-25681-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1317566760-25681-23-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <20111004104713.GY4118@sortiz-mobl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20111004104713.GY4118@sortiz-mobl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Samuel Ortiz Cc: Tony Lindgren , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Ujfalusi , Balaji T K , Hemanth V , Bill Gatliff List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 04 October 2011, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 04:45:52PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > We can only have one pwm driver built into the kernel, > I seem to remember that Bill Gatliff was working on a PWM subsystem that would > get rid of the current pwm.h ugliness. Do we have any updates on this one ? I don't know if the work on the pwm subsystem is progressing right now, there were at one point two competing patches, but so far neither of them has made it into linux-next. > The patch below looks like a hack to me, trying to work around the current > lack of such subsystem. Absolutely. I'll clarify this in the patch description when I fix the bug pointed out by Balaji T Krishnamoorthy. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 16:47:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 22/30] mfd: build twl6030 only on omap2 In-Reply-To: <20111004104713.GY4118@sortiz-mobl> References: <1317566760-25681-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1317566760-25681-23-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <20111004104713.GY4118@sortiz-mobl> Message-ID: <201110041647.02690.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tuesday 04 October 2011, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 04:45:52PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > We can only have one pwm driver built into the kernel, > I seem to remember that Bill Gatliff was working on a PWM subsystem that would > get rid of the current pwm.h ugliness. Do we have any updates on this one ? I don't know if the work on the pwm subsystem is progressing right now, there were at one point two competing patches, but so far neither of them has made it into linux-next. > The patch below looks like a hack to me, trying to work around the current > lack of such subsystem. Absolutely. I'll clarify this in the patch description when I fix the bug pointed out by Balaji T Krishnamoorthy. Arnd