From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Samsung devel-2 for v3.2 Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 00:05:17 +0100 Message-ID: <20111005230516.GA30439@sirena.org.uk> References: <002001cc80e5$3e497790$badc66b0$%kim@samsung.com> <20111002192950.GB1005@sirena.org.uk> <019201cc8293$7776a790$6663f6b0$%kim@samsung.com> <20111005165401.GA7155@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:52882 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935493Ab1JEXFT (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2011 19:05:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111005165401.GA7155@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Kukjin Kim Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, 'Arnd Bergmann' On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 05:54:02PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 09:45:16PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Could you please test on Cragganmore board again only with my for-next-test > > branch? > I tried this, same result as -next. v3.1-rc8 works fine. I also tried > a bisect which was a bit of a nightmare due to soc_is_ and S5P_VA_GPIOn > not being defined in the GPIO code and other places in a lot of > revisions so I didn't finish it, perhaps later. I also meant to say that I tried printascii() also and it didn't seem to produce any additional logging. I'll complete the bisect and poke a bit more tomorrow. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 00:05:17 +0100 Subject: [GIT PULL] Samsung devel-2 for v3.2 In-Reply-To: <20111005165401.GA7155@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <002001cc80e5$3e497790$badc66b0$%kim@samsung.com> <20111002192950.GB1005@sirena.org.uk> <019201cc8293$7776a790$6663f6b0$%kim@samsung.com> <20111005165401.GA7155@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Message-ID: <20111005230516.GA30439@sirena.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 05:54:02PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 09:45:16PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Could you please test on Cragganmore board again only with my for-next-test > > branch? > I tried this, same result as -next. v3.1-rc8 works fine. I also tried > a bisect which was a bit of a nightmare due to soc_is_ and S5P_VA_GPIOn > not being defined in the GPIO code and other places in a lot of > revisions so I didn't finish it, perhaps later. I also meant to say that I tried printascii() also and it didn't seem to produce any additional logging. I'll complete the bisect and poke a bit more tomorrow.