From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: remove erroneous sk null assignment in timestamping
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 09:57:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111008075719.GA2284@netboy.at.omicron.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111007.133356.489094996618032061.davem@davemloft.net>
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 01:33:56PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> It looks like skb_clone_tx_timestamp() sets clone->sk without any
> proper refcounting, so I bet this NULL'ing it out is working
> around that bug.
I don't remember why I put it that way, but I took a look at the
problem, and I am not sure how to solve it. The other callers of
sock_queue_err_skb all create or clone the error skb immediately
before queueing it:
net/core/skbuff.c: skb_tstamp_tx
net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c: ip_icmp_error, ip_local_error
net/ipv6/datagram.c: ipv6_icmp_error, ipv6_local_error
So I need to prevent the socket from disappearing between
skb_clone_tx_timestamp and skb_complete_tx_timestamp:
skb_clone_tx_timestamp
clone = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
sock_hold
skb_complete_tx_timestamp
sock_queue_err_skb(sk, skb);
sock_put
What do you think?
BTW, while looking for a good pattern to follow, I found that the can
driver also sets skb->sk after clone with no special treatment, like
so:
drivers/net/can/dev.c:285
can_put_echo_skb
struct sock *srcsk = skb->sk;
skb = skb_clone(old_skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
skb->sk = srcsk;
> The TX side of this infrastructure seems very poorly tested.
In fact, we do have the phyter driver used in an extensive automated
test farm, but the applications just don't do the kinds of things
suggested to trigger the problem. The normal pattern is, send event
packet, get tx timestamp, and so we haven't seen the bug at all.
Thanks,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-08 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-07 17:11 [RFC] net: remove erroneous sk null assignment in timestamping Johannes Berg
2011-10-07 17:33 ` David Miller
2011-10-07 17:40 ` Johannes Berg
2011-10-07 17:47 ` Johannes Berg
2011-10-07 17:53 ` Johannes Berg
2011-10-07 18:42 ` Johannes Berg
2011-10-08 7:59 ` Richard Cochran
2011-10-08 7:57 ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2011-10-08 8:16 ` Johannes Berg
2011-10-08 8:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-08 10:32 ` Johannes Berg
2011-10-11 13:34 ` Richard Cochran
2011-10-08 10:35 ` Richard Cochran
2011-10-12 18:36 ` [PATCH 1/1] net: hold sock reference while processing tx timestamps Richard Cochran
2011-10-12 19:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-12 19:27 ` Johannes Berg
2011-10-12 19:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-13 8:54 ` Johannes Berg
2011-10-13 4:51 ` Richard Cochran
2011-10-13 9:46 ` [PATCH 0/3] net: time stamping fixes Richard Cochran
2011-10-13 9:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] net: hold sock reference while processing tx timestamps Richard Cochran
2011-10-19 4:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-13 9:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] dp83640: use proper function to free transmit time stamping packets Richard Cochran
2011-10-19 4:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-13 9:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] dp83640: free packet queues on remove Richard Cochran
2011-10-19 4:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-19 4:16 ` [PATCH 0/3] net: time stamping fixes David Miller
2011-10-19 5:15 ` Johannes Berg
2011-10-19 11:50 ` Richard Cochran
2011-10-19 12:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-19 12:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-19 12:58 ` Johannes Berg
2011-10-19 13:09 ` Johannes Berg
2011-10-19 13:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-19 13:35 ` Johannes Berg
2011-10-19 13:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-19 13:57 ` Johannes Berg
2011-10-19 14:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-19 14:24 ` Johannes Berg
2011-10-19 14:27 ` Richard Cochran
2011-10-19 14:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-19 13:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-19 13:25 ` Johannes Berg
2011-10-19 13:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-19 13:32 ` Johannes Berg
2011-10-19 14:25 ` Richard Cochran
2011-10-21 10:49 ` [PATCH v2 " Richard Cochran
2011-10-21 10:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] net: hold sock reference while processing tx timestamps Richard Cochran
2011-10-21 11:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-10-24 6:55 ` David Miller
2011-10-21 11:44 ` Johannes Berg
2011-10-21 10:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dp83640: use proper function to free transmit time stamping packets Richard Cochran
2011-10-24 6:55 ` David Miller
2011-10-24 17:47 ` Richard Cochran
2011-10-24 23:16 ` David Miller
2011-10-21 10:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] dp83640: free packet queues on remove Richard Cochran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111008075719.GA2284@netboy.at.omicron.at \
--to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.