From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: vmalloc_sync_all() patch problems? Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:51:11 -0400 Message-ID: <20111010155110.GA29026@phenom.oracle.com> References: <4E832F1A.3030209@theshore.net> <4E83330A.3030509@citrix.com> <4E834519.3090300@theshore.net> <4E8353B1.9070007@citrix.com> <4E85E26F.1030202@theshore.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E85E26F.1030202@theshore.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Christopher S. Aker" Cc: xen devel , David Vrabel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:38:23AM -0400, Christopher S. Aker wrote: > On 9/28/11 1:04 PM, David Vrabel wrote: > >On 28/09/11 17:02, Christopher S. Aker wrote: > >>I've restarted the tests to see if I can reproduce, but I'm certain that > >>if it happened once, it'll happen again. > > I was able to reproduce it. > > >Instead of the vmalloc_sync_all() patch you could try this series instead. > > > >http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-09/msg01343.html > > I'll rebuild using this series and reset the tests. Will let you know! ping?