From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id p9AGRFDk188293 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:27:16 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 449E81F1F832 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:27:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.109.252]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id PaoRntsXmBwrlsF9 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:27:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 12:27:14 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfstests: make 203 pass on non-default block size filesystems Message-ID: <20111010162714.GB11902@infradead.org> References: <1318212855-20212-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1318212855-20212-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1318212855-20212-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 01:14:15PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > The xfs_bmap output in the golden image is filesystem block size > dependent. Make all writes 64k to ensure that the allocation/hole > pattern is consistent across all supported filesystem block sizes. > > Also, use the SCRATCH_DEV instead of the TEST_DEV so that we test > according to MKFS_OPTIONS rather than test on whatever setup the > TEST_DEV was created with. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs