From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752619Ab1JKGYn (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2011 02:24:43 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:53458 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751819Ab1JKGYm (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Oct 2011 02:24:42 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 08:22:53 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andrew Lutomirski Cc: richard -rw- weinberger , Linus Torvalds , Adrian Bunk , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [3.1 patch] x86: default to vsyscall=native Message-ID: <20111011062253.GA3589@elte.hu> References: <20111010114840.GC17079@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > Andrew? > > I think I know what the root cause is and I have most of a patch to > fix it. It doesn't compile (yet), it's a little less trivial than > I'd like for something this late in the -rc cycle, and it adds 16 > bytes to thread_struct (ugh!). > > I think I can make a follow-up patch that removes 32 bytes of > per-thread state to restore my karma, though, but that will > definitely not be 3.1 material. Ok, i've queued up the vsyscall=native patch in tip:x86/urgent for now - we can re-try in v3.2 (perhaps) if a satisfactory solution is found. Thanks, Ingo