From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: vmalloc_sync_all() patch problems? Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:28:38 -0400 Message-ID: <20111011172838.GA32406@phenom.oracle.com> References: <4E832F1A.3030209@theshore.net> <4E83330A.3030509@citrix.com> <4E834519.3090300@theshore.net> <4E8353B1.9070007@citrix.com> <4E85E26F.1030202@theshore.net> <20111010155110.GA29026@phenom.oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Christopher S. Aker" Cc: xen devel , David Vrabel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:18:12AM -0400, Christopher S. Aker wrote: > On Oct 10, 2011, at 11:51 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:38:23AM -0400, Christopher S. Aker wrote: > >> On 9/28/11 1:04 PM, David Vrabel wrote: > >>> On 28/09/11 17:02, Christopher S. Aker wrote: > >>>> I've restarted the tests to see if I can reproduce, but I'm certain that > >>>> if it happened once, it'll happen again. > >> > >> I was able to reproduce it. > >> > >>> Instead of the vmalloc_sync_all() patch you could try this series instead. > >>> > >>> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-09/msg01343.html > >> > >> I'll rebuild using this series and reset the tests. Will let you know! > > > > ping? > > With that patchset applied: 6 days of thrashing, 30000 domains cycled, and no crashes. I'd say it worked. Excellent. You got any more bugs that we should be aware off ? (hopefully not).