From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E68FE005BB for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:36:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2011 05:36:52 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,334,1315206000"; d="scan'208";a="72715318" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.120.213]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2011 05:36:52 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: poky@yoctoproject.org Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:36:51 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.38-11-generic-pae; KDE/4.6.5; i686; ; ) References: <1865303E0DED764181A9D882DEF65FB6D23164EA25@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20111012121249.GO27073@jama.jama.net> In-Reply-To: <20111012121249.GO27073@jama.jama.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201110121336.51474.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] xserver-xf86-dri-lite: rename it to xserver-xorg X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:36:53 -0000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wednesday 12 October 2011 13:12:50 Martin Jansa wrote: > Maybe it's because of extra > --enable-dga which is by default disabled in xserver-xorg-common, but > maybe we can enable it by default and keep it disabled only for > xserver-xorg-lite as in attached patch (which would need PR bump too). I meant to ask about this earlier - do we really still need DGA? Last I heard, and even that was some years ago, DGA was pretty ancient and the advice was it should no longer be used. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre