From: "Henrik Rydberg" <rydberg@euromail.se>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dtor@mail.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] input: Fix USB autosuspend on bcm5974
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:20:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111013082016.GA2209@polaris.bitmath.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1110121518510.2093-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
> It's always a bug. However, the patch I sent to Matthew should fix the
> immediate problem.
>
> In fact, the original autosuspend design intended to allow drivers to
> do this -- keep devices awake by failing suspend requests even though
> the usage count is 0. Under some conditions, that's the approach with
> the least overhead. But the code to handle this got lost by mistake,
> so now it needs to be added back.
I tried the patch out, unfortunately it did not work. The second
suspend request returns with a -EINPROGRESS, here:
if (dev->power.runtime_status == RPM_SUSPENDING) {
DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
if (rpmflags & (RPM_ASYNC | RPM_NOWAIT)) {
retval = -EINPROGRESS;
goto out;
}
/* Wait for the other suspend running in parallel with us. */
for (;;) {
The reason is above my horizon, although RPM_ASYNC looks suspicious.
In general, we are re-entering rpm_suspend from within the driver
handler, so the exit condition of rpm_suspend may not have been
satisfied yet.
Thanks,
Henrik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-13 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-10 15:47 [PATCH V3] input: Fix USB autosuspend on bcm5974 Matthew Garrett
2011-10-10 21:05 ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-10-10 21:12 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-10-10 22:44 ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-10-11 0:11 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-10-11 4:10 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-11 11:04 ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-10-11 11:09 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-11 20:42 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-10-12 6:32 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-12 14:33 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-12 14:37 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-12 15:28 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-12 16:16 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-10-12 16:56 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-12 16:59 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-10-12 17:24 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-12 17:26 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-10-12 17:41 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-12 18:33 ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-10-12 19:21 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-13 8:20 ` Henrik Rydberg [this message]
2011-10-13 15:49 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-13 17:21 ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-10-12 17:11 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-12 19:18 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-11 16:05 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-10-11 16:43 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-12 7:03 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-12 13:54 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-10-12 14:18 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-12 14:26 ` Matthew Garrett
2011-10-12 14:38 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-12 18:50 ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-10-13 6:47 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-10-10 21:16 ` Matthew Garrett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111013082016.GA2209@polaris.bitmath.org \
--to=rydberg@euromail.se \
--cc=dtor@mail.ru \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.