From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't use UDMA on VIA UDMA33 controller with Transcend SSD Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:35:22 +0200 Message-ID: <201110131235.40956.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <20091117.043002.224755438.davem@davemloft.net> <201110121638.09605.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20111012185952.3f36718b@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:35213 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754739Ab1JMKmP (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:42:15 -0400 Received: by mail-gy0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 13so1660159gyb.19 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 03:42:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20111012185952.3f36718b@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: David Miller , mpatocka@redhat.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > > > The last state on this I saw it seemd that exactly one person had seen it > > > on exactly one machine ? Has that changed ? > > > > No, you're right here. > > So as far as is known its a weird glitch on one persons box with one > device with one firmware that's not been replicated ? > > That's not a patch candidate really is it. Should we revert following commit then? commit 10734fc8d5fbf89e88519d72e58cce83be21941a Author: Alan Cox Date: Mon Nov 30 13:22:43 2009 +0000 pata_via: Blacklist some combinations of Transcend Flash and via Reported by Mikulas Patocka. VIA VT82C586B + Transcend TS64GSSD25-M v0826 does not work in UDMA mode Signed-off-by: Alan Cox Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik