All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
To: boyd yang <boyd.yang@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, eparis@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fanotify: to differ file access event from different threads
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 09:38:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111013133815.GC2310@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE8kqZKQrDK4SAKc8vK7Wi46dGQBw6_LX2NFvkr-XZr_KmGhrQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 04:56:43PM +0800, boyd yang wrote:
> This patch fixes a hang problem of Eric Paris's fs Notification/fanotify.
> 
> Fanotify brings a way to intercept file access events.
> When multiple threadsiterate the same direcotry, some thread will hang.
> This patch let fanotify to differ access events from different
> threads, prevent fanotify from merging access events from different
> threads.
> 

You need to run this through checkpatch.pl, you have a ton of formatting
problems.  Also your email client seems to have word-wrapped parts of this, so
use a email client that doesn't word wrap.

> =============================================================
> 
> diff -r -u linux-3.1-rc4_orig/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
> linux-3.1-rc4/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
> --- linux-3.1-rc4_orig/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c	2011-08-29
> 12:16:01.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-3.1-rc4/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c	2011-10-10
> 12:28:23.276847000 +0800
> @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@
> 
>  	if (old->to_tell == new->to_tell &&
>  	    old->data_type == new->data_type &&
> -	    old->tgid == new->tgid) {
> +	    old->tgid == new->tgid &&
> +	    old->pid == new->pid) {
>  		switch (old->data_type) {
>  		case (FSNOTIFY_EVENT_PATH):
>  			if ((old->path.mnt == new->path.mnt) &&
> @@ -144,11 +145,19 @@
>  		return PTR_ERR(notify_event);
> 
>  #ifdef CONFIG_FANOTIFY_ACCESS_PERMISSIONS
> -	if (event->mask & FAN_ALL_PERM_EVENTS) {
> -		/* if we merged we need to wait on the new event */
> -		if (notify_event)
> -			event = notify_event;
> -		ret = fanotify_get_response_from_access(group, event);
> +	//if overflow, do not wait for response
> +	if(fsnotify_isoverflow(event))
> +	{
> +		pr_debug("fanotify overflow!\n");
> +	}
> +	else
> +	{
> +		if (event->mask & FAN_ALL_PERM_EVENTS) {
> +			/* if we merged we need to wait on the new event */
> +			if (notify_event)
> +				event = notify_event;
> +			ret = fanotify_get_response_from_access(group, event);
> +		}
>  	}

The overflow event should only have FS_Q_OVERFLOW set in it's mask right?  So
why is this test needed at all?  Thanks,

Josef

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-13 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-13  8:56 [PATCH] fanotify: to differ file access event from different threads boyd yang
2011-10-13 13:27 ` boyd yang
2011-10-13 14:35   ` Américo Wang
2011-10-13 13:38 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2011-10-14  6:56   ` boyd yang
2011-10-14  6:56     ` boyd yang
2011-11-17 10:21     ` boyd yang
2011-11-24 14:58       ` Jan Kara
2011-12-06  1:24         ` boyd yang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-12-06  1:23 boyd yang
2011-12-10 16:25 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2013-02-11 19:49 ` Mihai Donțu
2011-10-10  6:45 boyd yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111013133815.GC2310@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=josef@redhat.com \
    --cc=boyd.yang@gmail.com \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.