From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: akpm@linux-foundation.org (Andrew Morton)
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:52:34 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v3.1-rc9] ARM: populate processor tag in proc-cpuinfo
	for Uni-processor.
In-Reply-To: <20111013164822.GJ21648@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1318520590-24372-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@st.com>
	<20111013164822.GJ21648@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <20111013135234.49f2d400.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:48:22 +0100
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 04:43:10PM +0100, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
> > We recently encountered issue while running cyclesoak on ARM-uniprocessor
> > system, What we have noticed it that /proc/cpuinfo does not have
> > "processor" tag when its uniprocessor, which looked incorrect.
> > All the processors code in kernel do populate this tag for both uni and
> > multi processor systems.
> > 
> > This patch just add processor tag for cpuinfo for ARM uni-processor systems.
> 
> I wonder why cyclesoak doesn't use the sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN)
> rather than implementing this functionality itself.
> 
> akpm?

eep, cyclesoak will soon be celebrating its eleventh birthday. 
sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN) might have existed back in those days,
but I sure didn't know about it!