From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko =?iso-8859-1?q?St=FCbner?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] S3C2416: Enable armdiv and armclk Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 09:27:17 +0200 Message-ID: <201110140927.18860.heiko@sntech.de> References: <201109281217.33813.heiko@sntech.de> <085f01cc8a40$df7af8a0$9e70e9e0$%kim@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from h1778886.stratoserver.net ([85.214.133.74]:41325 "EHLO h1778886.stratoserver.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751326Ab1JNH1b convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Oct 2011 03:27:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <085f01cc8a40$df7af8a0$9e70e9e0$%kim@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Kukjin Kim Cc: 'Ben Dooks' , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Hi Kgene, Am Freitag, 14. Oktober 2011, 09:14:11 schrieb Kukjin Kim: > Heiko St=FCbner wrote: [...] > > Heiko Stuebner (8): > > S3C2416: Add armdiv_mask constant. [...] > As a note, if required, 1st patch which is fixing will be sent to sta= ble. I don't think this is really necessary. The original code was essentially correct but hard to read. The constant makes sense in the rework, as the armdiv_mask is is used i= n more=20 places now and not contained in a single static function. Heiko From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko =?iso-8859-1?q?St=FCbner?=) Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 09:27:17 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 0/8] S3C2416: Enable armdiv and armclk In-Reply-To: <085f01cc8a40$df7af8a0$9e70e9e0$%kim@samsung.com> References: <201109281217.33813.heiko@sntech.de> <085f01cc8a40$df7af8a0$9e70e9e0$%kim@samsung.com> Message-ID: <201110140927.18860.heiko@sntech.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Kgene, Am Freitag, 14. Oktober 2011, 09:14:11 schrieb Kukjin Kim: > Heiko St?bner wrote: [...] > > Heiko Stuebner (8): > > S3C2416: Add armdiv_mask constant. [...] > As a note, if required, 1st patch which is fixing will be sent to stable. I don't think this is really necessary. The original code was essentially correct but hard to read. The constant makes sense in the rework, as the armdiv_mask is is used in more places now and not contained in a single static function. Heiko