Re: [PATCHv3 11/16] Bluetooth: EWS: handling different Control fields

[Gustavo Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>]

Hi Andrei,

* Emeltchenko Andrei <Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@gmail.com> [2011-10-14 13:56:03 +0300]:

> Hi Gustavo,
> 
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 04:49:25PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > * Emeltchenko Andrei <Andrei.Emeltchenko.news@gmail.com> [2011-10-11 13:37:51 +0300]:
> > 
> > > From: Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko@intel.com>
> > > 
> > > There are three different Control Field formats: the Standard Control
> > > Field, the Enhanced Control Field, and the Extended Control Field.
> > > Patch adds function to handle all those fields seamlessly.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrei Emeltchenko <andrei.emeltchenko@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h |   43 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c    |   93 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> > >  2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h b/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h
> > > index 67a2fdb..3a5f4c0 100644
> > > --- a/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h
> > > +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h
> > > @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
> > >  #ifndef __L2CAP_H
> > >  #define __L2CAP_H
> > >  
> > > +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
> > > +
> > >  /* L2CAP defaults */
> > >  #define L2CAP_DEFAULT_MTU		672
> > >  #define L2CAP_DEFAULT_MIN_MTU		48
> > > @@ -643,6 +645,47 @@ static inline bool __is_ctrl_poll(struct l2cap_chan *chan, __u32 ctrl)
> > >  	else
> > >  		return ctrl & L2CAP_CTRL_POLL;
> > >  }
> > > +
> > > +static inline __u32 __get_control(struct l2cap_chan *chan, void *p)
> > > +{
> > > +	if (test_bit(FLAG_EXT_CTRL, &chan->flags))
> > > +		return get_unaligned_le32(p);
> > > +	else
> > > +		return get_unaligned_le16(p);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline __u32 __get_control_pull(struct l2cap_chan *chan,
> > > +		struct sk_buff *skb, void *p)
> > > +{
> > > +	__u32 ctrl;
> > > +
> > > +	if (test_bit(FLAG_EXT_CTRL, &chan->flags)) {
> > > +		ctrl = get_unaligned_le32(p);
> > > +		skb_pull(skb, 4);
> > > +	} else {
> > > +		ctrl = get_unaligned_le16(p);
> > > +		skb_pull(skb, 2);
> > > +	}
> > 
> > 
> > I prefer not hide the skb_pull inside another function.
> 
> OK, I will change it to something like:
> 
> <------8<----------------------------------------------------------------
> |  @@ -4005,7 +4009,8 @@ static int l2cap_ertm_data_rcv(struct sock *sk,
> |  struct sk_buff *skb)
> |          u16 req_seq;
> |          int len, next_tx_seq_offset, req_seq_offset;
> |
> |  -       control = __get_control_pull(chan, skb, skb->data);
> |  +       control = __get_control(chan, skb->data);
> |  +       skb_pull(skb, __get_ctrl_size(chan));
> |          len = skb->len;
> |
> |          /*
> |
> <------8<----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> > > +
> > > +	return ctrl;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline void __put_control(struct l2cap_chan *chan, __u32 control, void *p)
> > > +{
> > > +	if (test_bit(FLAG_EXT_CTRL, &chan->flags))
> > > +		return put_unaligned_le32(control, p);
> > > +	else
> > > +		return put_unaligned_le16(control, p);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline void __put_control_put(struct l2cap_chan *chan, __u32 control, void *p)
> > > +{
> > > +	if (test_bit(FLAG_EXT_CTRL, &chan->flags))
> > > +		return put_unaligned_le32(control, skb_put(p, 4));
> > > +	else
> > > +		return put_unaligned_le16(control, skb_put(p, 2));
> > > +}
> > 
> > 
> > get ride of this, you still can do __put_control(chan, control,
> > skb_put())
> the second argument in skb_put changes so I cannot use proposed way.

Why not? 

You just call __put_control(chan, control, skb_put(skb, N));

This pass exactly what you want to __put_control(). Do you agree?

	Gustavo