From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753749Ab1JORGf (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:06:35 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:41973 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753456Ab1JORGe (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Oct 2011 13:06:34 -0400 Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 19:04:52 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: David Ahern Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker , Mike Galbraith , Paul Mackerras , Peter Zijlstra , Stephane Eranian , Thomas Jarosch , arnaldo.melo@gmail.com Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/5] perf/core improvements and fixes Message-ID: <20111015170452.GD29782@elte.hu> References: <1318616873-26739-1-git-send-email-acme@infradead.org> <20111015145946.GB9516@elte.hu> <4E99BC44.40400@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E99BC44.40400@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.3.1 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * David Ahern wrote: > On 10/15/2011 08:59 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Btw., i noticed another weirdness - sometimes after startup i get > > this message: > > > > /lib64/libc-2.14.90.so was updated, restart the long running apps that use it! > > > > but it was not updated recently: > > > > earth5:~/tip/tools/perf> ll /lib64/libc-2.14.90.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2062920 Sep 28 15:11 /lib64/libc-2.14.90.so > > earth5:~/tip/tools/perf> date > > Sat Oct 15 16:59:04 CEST 2011 > > earth5:~/tip/tools/perf> uptime > > 16:59:08 up 19 days, 21:35, 11 users, load average: 7.77, 7.48, 3.81 > > I got the impression that comment was relative to when the > processes were started versus prelink touching it. In your case the > mod time of libc is after the uptime of the box. Ok, that makes sense. Do we report this in perf report output as well? Thanks, Ingo