From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fw.wantstofly.org ([80.101.37.227] helo=mail.wantstofly.org) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1RFZkn-0000I9-Iz for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 23:04:26 +0000 Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 01:04:18 +0200 From: Lennert Buytenhek To: Kevin Paul Herbert Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] mtd m25p80: add support for Macronix MX25L12805D Message-ID: <20111016230418.GF18227@wantstofly.org> References: <63A7EBF6-2A5D-4607-AA5C-CC8F3ED0C29B@meraki.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <63A7EBF6-2A5D-4607-AA5C-CC8F3ED0C29B@meraki.net> Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 05:32:42PM -0700, Kevin Paul Herbert wrote: > Is there a reason that you did not include SECT_4K for the MX25L12805D? > The chips that I have support it, and its in the data sheet. Was this > an oversight or is there a problem with some chips? An oversight. If SECT_4K works for you (I don't have hardware to test with anymore), go ahead and submit a patch.