From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/27] cbus: tahvo: convert spinlock into mutex Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:19:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20111017181926.GC27515@atomide.com> References: <1318494902-13093-1-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com> <20111017172035.GB27515@atomide.com> <20111017180411.GA31828@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:59535 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751076Ab1JQST3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:19:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111017180411.GA31828@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Felipe Balbi Cc: Linux OMAP Mailing List * Felipe Balbi [111017 10:30]: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:20:35AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Felipe Balbi [111013 01:01]: > > > GPIO operations can sleep, so move to a > > > mutex. > > > > Great, seems to boot on n800 so pushing all into > > cbus branch. > > cool thanks. I think this is pretty much ready for mainline. At least > retu. Unless you have any other plans for these little guys. Well I guess they should be in drivers/mfd, but other than that yeah these are the last pieces of non-mainline code dragging around. > They have been missing from mainline for a loooong time though. I'm > still concerned about the whole cbus bus implementation. Maybe we should > the i2c framework (which already supports a few buses) and implement > i2c-cbus-gpio.c ?? What do you think ? Heh I guess that's doable too :) Or drivers/spi maybe? Tony