From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-dy0-f47.google.com ([209.85.220.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RGHWE-0000wj-5w for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:48:18 +0200 Received: by dye36 with SMTP id 36so64169dye.6 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:42:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=0W7crJcmF/xJ7n2EC5xyJkwzGnx5ofXPT7BrAq5+suk=; b=GTR01uBlBvbalC76xdOIY8qe6JLtcyjzJRtD2BTz+Wk1sxNtGLRdKU+WzRlJT0x/bq FiFIcLaCbmFqmECYTrGzsSs0MXpqvMS1Qu1uHXLVBu9hzJVpQCMrP91fUDpleZLRUYCF 0v1+svTLLuGvjjp3ojorAUSrS+J2ESAV5FEgw= Received: by 10.223.63.75 with SMTP id a11mr6619272fai.9.1318974146651; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:42:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([94.230.152.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r24sm1080036faa.8.2011.10.18.14.42.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:42:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:42:20 +0200 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20111018214220.GG556@jama.jama.net> References: <20111018203818.GD556@jama.jama.net> <20111018204954.GA27472@sakrah.homelinux.org> <20111018211015.GE556@jama.jama.net> <20111018213635.GD27508@sakrah.homelinux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20111018213635.GD27508@sakrah.homelinux.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: Patchwork breaking submitters name Was: Patchwork hooks for meta-oe active and working X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:48:18 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 34885 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/Zw+/jwnNHcBRYYu" Content-Disposition: inline --/Zw+/jwnNHcBRYYu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 02:36:35PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On (18/10/11 23:10), Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 01:49:54PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On (18/10/11 22:38), Martin Jansa wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 09:32:13AM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > >=20 > > > > > Hi, > > > > >=20 > > > > > Thanks to Khem the patchwork hooks for meta-oe (and hence meta-ef= l, > > > > > meta-gnome and meta-xfce) are active and working. > > > > > Once the commits hit the OE server the state will get updated aut= omatically, > > > > > so the submitter will instantly know when his/her patch has hit t= he repo. > > > > >=20 > > > > > regards, > > > >=20 > > > > There is known and fixed issue with patchwork breaking author name > > > >=20 > > > > We have an example in patch > > > > "[meta-oe] lightmediascanner: Add version 0.4.4 (initial recipe)" > > > > Original e-mail says "Pau Espin Pedrol " > > > > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2011-Octobe= r/035644.html > > > >=20 > > > > older patchwork instance says only "pespin " > > > > http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/13323/ > > > > newer patchwork instance says also "pespin " > > > > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/13323/ > > > >=20 > > > > Same problem was reported also on LKML > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/18/128 > > > > And later fixed by Jeremy Kerr > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/18/149 > > > >=20 > > > > Can we get this upstream fix to our patchwork instance too? > > >=20 > > > This patch is already applied to the new patchwork instance on > > > patchwork.openembedded.org however it was only yesterday when it came > > > into life. > >=20 > > But still it doesn't work today: > > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/13437/ > >=20 > > and from Kerr's reply I'm not sure if someone has to fix something in > > patchwork database or if registered users can fix it in their profile > > page.. or maybe he fixed only Submitter fields for existing patches in > > database.. >=20 > yes the user profile for existing users have to be updated which I have > done for Pau now. So it should be ok. Please re-check the patchwork. Almost :), there is missing 'l' =46rom: Pau Espin Pedro =46rom: Pau Espin Pedrol Is it possible for registred patchwork user to update it or do we need to ask you when we found similar issue for someone else? Thanks! --=20 Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com --/Zw+/jwnNHcBRYYu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk6d8rsACgkQN1Ujt2V2gBxYDgCdGR3m86AL7mI49YbFTxbFGLO+ 03EAoK5XKQkkXYDUS9SGssKUwwZDbBxf =u+S9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/Zw+/jwnNHcBRYYu--