diff for duplicates of <20111019094356.GC3083@infradead.org>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index e79da83..6255ccf 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -3,3 +3,8 @@ On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 02:28:55PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
 
 Any reason you can't simply fold btrfs defragmentation testing into
 the existing common defragmentation test (218)?
+
+_______________________________________________
+xfs mailing list
+xfs@oss.sgi.com
+http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 923fc58..7d53b52 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -8,14 +8,18 @@
  "Cc\0hch@infradead.org"
   linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
   linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
-  xfs@oss.sgi.com
- " david@fromorbit.com\0"
+ " xfs@oss.sgi.com\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 02:28:55PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:\n"
  "> To verify the btrfs de-fragmentation does not fail.\n"
  "\n"
  "Any reason you can't simply fold btrfs defragmentation testing into\n"
- the existing common defragmentation test (218)?
+ "the existing common defragmentation test (218)?\n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "xfs mailing list\n"
+ "xfs@oss.sgi.com\n"
+ http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
 
-b5cd1f334d9977f9e38ce640e90a3e334a099fb873773bdfea2e18ea4335e488
+952504bef76b205cfc553edf67f7be972f2478a27e91bdb70f32cef740c1eb6c
