From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: ASoC driver parts probing order (MPC5200/MPC5121) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:13:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20111020121303.GE2379@pengutronix.de> References: <20111020122317.6c705289@archvile> <20111020105940.GB2379@pengutronix.de> <20111020133758.27011ac7@archvile> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2496842207027403124==" Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de (metis.ext.pengutronix.de [92.198.50.35]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4A524765 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:13:06 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20111020133758.27011ac7@archvile> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: David Jander Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org --===============2496842207027403124== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HnQK338I3UIa/qiP" Content-Disposition: inline --HnQK338I3UIa/qiP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > I think I was not clear enough. I meant sound/soc/fsl/mpc5200_dma.c, not = the > actual Bestcom DMA driver. Ah, okay, sorry misunderstood that. > Btw, I am writing a DMA-less driver for the MPC5121e for now. It uses the= PSC > FIFO and FIFO alarm interrupts. DMA support could be added later, when de > MPC5121 DMA driver becomes capable of doing device IO. OK, seems sensible for a start. MPC5121 does not get much love, so small steps are definately a good idea. > > > 1.- I can't test it on a MPC5200B, so therefor I need help. > >=20 > > I can do tests. >=20 > If you could try out latest mainline, to see if the driver still works, > that would be great for a start. I am almost certain it either doesn't wo= rk > anymore, or you have a 50% chance it crashes while booting. OK, I will leave for Prague in the next hours, so until I return, I can do only remote testing. But I should see OOPSes this way nonetheless. Might take a few days, though... Regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --HnQK338I3UIa/qiP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk6gEE8ACgkQD27XaX1/VRujCQCeORGR9ItDvvTlZp4XM0obZ10s RJ4An0F0bVUaZX9coRumSrnQVMF1kART =qgWo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HnQK338I3UIa/qiP-- --===============2496842207027403124== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --===============2496842207027403124==--