From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Samsung devel-2 for v3.2
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:57:08 +0200
Message-ID: <201110201457.09228.arnd@arndb.de>
References: <002001cc80e5$3e497790$badc66b0$%kim@samsung.com> <20111007191443.GA12004@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <034701cc8704$e86035a0$b920a0e0$%kim@samsung.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:62613 "EHLO
	moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752520Ab1JTM5O (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:57:14 -0400
In-Reply-To: <034701cc8704$e86035a0$b920a0e0$%kim@samsung.com>
Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
To: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: 'Mark Brown' <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org

On Monday 10 October 2011, Kukjin Kim wrote:

> Yes I agree with you and I believe we don't need to revert it during next
> -rc :)
> 
> Arnd, could you please pull that for v3.2?
> If any problems, please let me know.

Sorry for the long delay. I've pulled it now and pushed it to the
next/devel2 branch, so I remember that it comes after the
next/board branch.

	Arnd

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:57:08 +0200
Subject: [GIT PULL] Samsung devel-2 for v3.2
In-Reply-To: <034701cc8704$e86035a0$b920a0e0$%kim@samsung.com>
References: <002001cc80e5$3e497790$badc66b0$%kim@samsung.com>
	<20111007191443.GA12004@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
	<034701cc8704$e86035a0$b920a0e0$%kim@samsung.com>
Message-ID: <201110201457.09228.arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Monday 10 October 2011, Kukjin Kim wrote:

> Yes I agree with you and I believe we don't need to revert it during next
> -rc :)
> 
> Arnd, could you please pull that for v3.2?
> If any problems, please let me know.

Sorry for the long delay. I've pulled it now and pushed it to the
next/devel2 branch, so I remember that it comes after the
next/board branch.

	Arnd