From: Flavio Leitner <fbl@redhat.com>
To: Flavio Leitner <fbl@redhat.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] route: fix ICMP redirect validation
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:47:02 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111020154702.13f69021@asterix.rh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111019160537.4aeedef8@asterix.rh>
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:05:37 -0200
Flavio Leitner <fbl@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:43:44 -0400 (EDT)
> David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> > From: Flavio Leitner <fbl@redhat.com>
> > Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:20:04 -0300
> >
> > > The commit f39925dbde7788cfb96419c0f092b086aa325c0f
> > > (ipv4: Cache learned redirect information in inetpeer.)
> > > removed some ICMP packet validations which are required by
> > > RFC 1122, section 3.2.2.2:
> >
> > The reason for putting this into the inetpeer cache was so that we
> > didn't need to consult the routing cache at all. We're working to
> > remove it at some point, so every dependency matters.
> >
> > Can you implement this such that only an inetpeer cache probe is
> > necessary?
> >
>
> Sure, I have reviewed your patch series to remove the routing
> cache and I believe this version works with and without it, though
> I have tested only with current net-next code.
>
> Thanks for your time reviewing, I appreciate it.
...
> @@ -1331,13 +1337,40 @@ void ip_rt_redirect(__be32 old_gw, __be32 daddr, __be32 new_gw,
> goto reject_redirect;
> }
>
> - peer = inet_getpeer_v4(daddr, 1);
> - if (peer) {
> - peer->redirect_learned.a4 = new_gw;
> + memset(&fl4, 0, sizeof(fl4));
> + fl4.daddr = daddr;
> + for (s = 0; s < 2; s++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> + fl4.flowi4_oif = ikeys[i];
> + fl4.saddr = skeys[s];
> + rt = __ip_route_output_key(net, &fl4);
> + if (IS_ERR(rt))
> + continue;
>
> - inet_putpeer(peer);
> + if (rt->dst.error || rt->dst.dev != dev ||
> + rt->rt_gateway != old_gw) {
> + ip_rt_put(rt);
> + continue;
> + }
>
> - atomic_inc(&__rt_peer_genid);
> + peer = rt->peer;
> + if (!peer) {
> + peer = inet_getpeer_v4(daddr, 1);
> + putpeer = true;
> + }
I was reviewing this again and instead of doing the above, it would
be better to use rt_bind_peer() to update rt->peer as well.
if (!rt->peer)
rt_bind_peer(rt, rt->rt_dst, 1);
peer = rt->peer;
if (peer) {
peer->redirect_learned.a4 = new_gw;
atomic_inc(&__rt_peer_genid);
}
but I am not sure if I understood you completely when you say
to do such that only an inetpeer cache probe is necessary.
thanks again,
fbl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-20 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-05 14:20 [PATCH] route: fix ICMP redirect validation Flavio Leitner
2011-10-17 23:43 ` David Miller
2011-10-19 18:05 ` Flavio Leitner
2011-10-20 17:47 ` Flavio Leitner [this message]
2011-10-20 20:19 ` David Miller
2011-10-21 18:13 ` Flavio Leitner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111020154702.13f69021@asterix.rh \
--to=fbl@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.