From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vms173011pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.11]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RH02q-0000Gc-P9 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 23:20:58 +0200 Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([unknown] [71.191.138.237]) by vms173011.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0LTD00268V0XC370@vms173011.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:14:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CDE0514AF5D; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:14:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:14:57 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-id: <20111020211457.GU26170@denix.org> References: <1319037014-29473-1-git-send-email-ulf_samuelsson@telia.com> <1319037014-29473-3-git-send-email-ulf_samuelsson@telia.com> <1319057924.12686.10.camel@mattotaupa> <20111019211838.GH3522@jama.jama.net> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <20111019211838.GH3522@jama.jama.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Update checksums for binutils-2.20.1.tar.bz2 X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 21:20:58 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:18:39PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:58:44PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 19.10.2011, 17:10 +0200 schrieb ulf_samuelsson@telia.com: > > > From: Ulf Samuelsson > > > > again, please comply with our commit policy [1]. > > > > binutils: Update from 2.20.1 to 2.20.1a > > > > > Tarball is updated to 2.20.1b so checksums have changed. > > > > I am not aware of any binutils version 2.20.1b. Do you mean 2.20.1a? > > > > Please create a new recipe since doing it this way the already > > downloaded sources would be made invalid and archives on mirrors would > > cause problems too. Darn it, from the subject line I got my hopes high that someone bit the bullet and made a proper patch for 2.20.1a... Guess not. :) > > Please see commit f4faecdb [2] as an example and take a look at the list > > discussion [3]. > > Better example commit in [4] > > > [1] http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Policy > > [2] http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded/commit/?id=f4faecdbd0b7c83e5787735ef1495a34aca861e4 > > [3] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2011-September/034885.html > > [4] http://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/commit/?id=15832ab1f64f2bc2ee7d342e5bff0351b5e2479b