From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?=) Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 11:43:09 +0200 Subject: [RFC][PATCH] uncompress.h cleanup and DT support In-Reply-To: <20111023092059.GB12814@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20111023084132.GA12814@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20111023092059.GB12814@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20111023094309.GM15299@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:20:59AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:12:50AM +0200, Zoltan Devai wrote: > > 2011/10/23 Russell King - ARM Linux : > > > On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:18:29AM +0200, Zoltan Devai wrote: > > >> Plase consider all this as RFC, it's mostly not even compile-tested. > > >> If you think it's worth to follow-up, I'm happy to do it. > > > > > > Is the patch available? > > git://github.com/zdevai/linux.git uncompress-h > > I'd rather not pull your tree just to look at the patch. Is it > available somewhere else? It's not hard to look at it and no need to pull, just do: git fetch git://github.com/zdevai/linux.git uncompress-h git log -p ..FETCH_HEAD (Of course you get the objects of the branch into your object-db but that shouldn't matter much.) Obviously this doesn't give a good opportunity to comment the patch. It's just to satisfy your curiosity. Just from a quick glance commit 77bf042c54650ecb39a0e6d79de827d3157cf817 is not OK. For example it changes the license terms of arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/uncompress.h from GPLv2+ to GPLv2 and removes a copyright. Ditto for some other files. In commit dbd13d823641694c633c01e8e33e21eb76a1aad2 git played tricks on you and removed a line like #define ARCH_HAVE_DECOMP_SETUP because it thought it's a comment that shouldn't go into the log. Note that this isn't very multi-SoC friendly. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |