From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@leon.nu>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: Register cache different from the real register values
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 16:37:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111023143754.GB23045@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALq1K=Lg=JGzGeuK04hVsC9iME=Q8Exv0N5nfcKWuYWFN4as5g@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 04:14:07PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 15:51, Mark Brown
> > Post your code for review and we
> > might be able to spot something.
> Our code is located at
> http://gitorious.org/~marvin24/ac100/marvin24s-kernel/blobs/chromeos-ac100-2.6.38/sound/soc/codecs/alc5632.c
Please post for upstream, it's much easier to review and ideally we
could even get the driver merged.
> > At a guess you're doing cache_only and
> > something's going wrong there
> I also tried to add codec->cache_sync = 1 to the _probe function, but
> without luck.
> http://gitorious.org/~marvin24/ac100/marvin24s-kernel/blobs/chromeos-ac100-2.6.38/sound/soc/codecs/alc5632.c#line998
You should only set cache_sync if you dirty the cache and then you need
to call cache_sync() at some point to actually sync the cache.
> > the register defaults are wrong or the
> Our style is a little different, because it is a port from the
> android, we will be change it later, before merging into the mainline
> to be more convenient.
> http://gitorious.org/~marvin24/ac100/marvin24s-kernel/blobs/chromeos-ac100-2.6.38/sound/soc/codecs/alc5632.c#line1023
Android is using the same kernel - there's no differences introduced by
Android here. If you're seeing differences they're driver quality
issues (probably caused by not being mainline).
Looking briefly at the code that android_init() function is just broken
and should be removed, any missing control should be implemented in the
driver. The fill_cache() function looks suspect also - in general all
the code peering directly into the register cache data structure smells
bad. You should have register defaults hard coded into the driver which
reflect the chip defaults so when we reset we know that's where the chip
is at.
Another thing to check is that the registers in the chip aren't
volatile, if the chip can change register values underneath the driver
then obviously things might get confused. Multiple copies of the same
control are a common culprit.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-23 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-23 13:09 Register cache different from the real register values Leon Romanovsky
2011-10-23 13:51 ` Mark Brown
2011-10-23 14:14 ` Leon Romanovsky
2011-10-23 14:37 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2011-10-24 7:26 ` Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111023143754.GB23045@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=leon@leon.nu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.