From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:32:31 +0100
Subject: Perf support for OMAP4
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVPxVQmAGmbhCH6KSogeQC3EcCseoApNABfmqWmGePpoOA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20110928155437.GA18202@e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
	<CACVXFVPxVQmAGmbhCH6KSogeQC3EcCseoApNABfmqWmGePpoOA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20111024133230.GA4449@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hello,

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 08:20:53AM +0100, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > I can't see your OMAP4 Perf/PMU patches from here:
> >
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2011-March/045283.html
> >
> > in mainline or next.
> >
> > Are you still pushing these or did you get blocked awaiting feedback?
> 
> OK, I will rebase the patch against -next tree and resend it later.

Ping? I'd really like to get this tested and queued for 3.3 as it's
currently blocking hardware perf-events on Pandaboard.

Will